Questõessobre Verbos modais | Modal verbs
In the sentence, “while it’s impossible to believe that everyone can speak in exactly the same way in all areas of
a vast nation, the different accents may at times be so difficult to understand that they inhibit communication”.
The modal verbs can and may express:
Considering language use in the text, it’s correct to say:
Consider the statements given and mark the
correct option, according to their grammar
features:
I. In the sentence “President Lula took part in a
ceremony that focused firmly on the future” the
relative pronoun that can be replaced by which
without changing the meaning of the sentence.
II. In the sentence “We have a chip, we have a
level that can be used on frontier control, we can
guarantee citizenship, and it can guarantee
transactions in the virtual world” the modal verb
can indicates an ability.
III. The word currently in the sentence
“Currently, Brazilians have to deal with a
confusing array of identity numbers” can be
substituted by the word nowadays without
changing the meaning of the sentence.
Sobre o uso da língua, no Texto I, é correto afirmar que:
I. As palavras “easier” e “harder”, que iniciam,
respectivamente, o 1º e o 2º parágrafos do texto I,
são exemplos de comparativos no grau superlativo.
II. “Who” (l.2) é um pronome relativo, na função de
objeto, e refere-se a “patriot”.
III. As palavras “fatherland” (l.5), “homeland” (l.6),
“attachment” (l.6),”physical” (l.6) e “devotion” (l.12)
são formadas por afixação e/ou justaposição.
IV. O termo “its”, presente três vezes nas linhas 11 e 12, é
um pronome possessivo e refere-se a “love”.
V. O modal “should” (l.17) expressa uma sugestão, um
aconselhamento.
A alternativa em que todas as afirmativas são verdadeiras é a:
Sobre o uso da língua, no Texto I, é correto afirmar que
I. o termo “our” (l.2) é um pronome possessivo e refere-se
aos leitores.
II. “which” (l.3) é um pronome relativo, na função de sujeito, e
refere-se a “daily activities”.
III. os termos “useless” e “unwanted” (l.5) são formados por
afixação.
IV. os modais “can” (l.5) e “may” (l.12) expressam a mesma
ideia: possibilidade.
V. os marcadores discursivos “or” (l.3), “and” (l.5) e “but” (l.12)
expressam, respectivamente, proporcionalidade, adição e
condição.
A alternativa em que todas as afirmativas são verdadeiras é a:
In the fragment from the text – The reader must know the meanings of enough of the words… – the modal
verb must could be correctly replaced, keeping the same meaning, by:
According to the text, it is correct to affirm that
the modal verb “must” (line 6) is used to express
the idea of possibility.
Considering language use in the text, it’s correct to say:
EVANS, Stephen. Disponível em: <www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2011/05/110518_witn_electric_cars_page.shtml>. Acesso em: 2 jun. 2011.
Considering language use in the text, it’s correct to say:
MIRCHANDANI, Rajesh. Polar bears will be protected in Alaska. Disponível em:<<www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/language/wordsinthenews/2010/11/100929_with_polarbears_page.shtml>. Acesso em: 2 dez. 2010.
The modal auxiliary “should” in the first sentence of the second paragraph of text C indicates
The MODALS ‘can’, ‘could’, ‘would’, ’might’ in TEXT E are used to show
Could Women Grow Their Own Sperm?
Anna Smajdor, an ethicist at the University of East Anglia, claims that people’s control over their reproductive choices will be dramatically altered if sperm and eggs can be created from stray skin cells. A woman could, for example, pick up a bit of bodily detritus from a prominent man, take it to a laboratory and give birth to his genetic child. Smajdor says that what has been termed ‘reprogrammable biology’ gives us the capacity to make cells act in new ways, blurring what we mean by an egg or sperm or even embryo. She points out that the boundaries between these categories have become very fluid, with the development of techniques that allow us to alter their genetic make-up or prompt them to behave in new ways. This raises very perplexing questions about ethics, law and regulation.
In the sentence: “The researchers say the findings
could be used to deal with the "global sleep crisis". the
modal verb could expresses:
The modal auxiliary “should” in the first sentence of the second paragraph of text C indicates
TEXT C
(The Economist, May 22nd, 2010)
Na linha 08, o modal verb “might”:
The word “should” used by the man
expresses:
Read text 1 to answer question.
Text 1
Newsweek. Available in
http://www.newsweek.com/photo/2008/12/18/cartoonsnewsweeks-best-of-2008.html.
Access on: May 03, 2011.
No fragmento do TEXTO 01 ―Butthe social media story extends well be yond Facebook‖, (linha 12) podese encontrar os seguintes elementos, EXCETO:
TEXTO 01
O verbo modal could nas construções “It could be 10%, it could be 15, it could be 20” expressa ideia
de:
O modal verb should em “People should develop skills that complement” (terceiro parágrafo) expressa a ideia de
Learn ‘n’ go
How quickly can people learn new skills?
Jan 25th 2014 – from the print edition
In 2012, Erik Brynjolfsson and Andrew McAfee took a ride in one of Google’s driverless cars. The car’s performance, they report, was flawless, boring and, above all, “weird”. Only a few years earlier, “We were sure that computers would not be able to drive cars.” Only humans, they thought, could make sense of the countless, shifting patterns of driving a car – with oncoming1 traffic, changing lights and wayward2 jaywalkers3 .
Machines have mastered driving. And not just driving. In ways that are only now becoming apparent, the authors argue, machines can forecast home prices, design beer bottles, teach at universities, grade exams and do countless other things better and more cheaply than humans. (…)
This will have one principal good consequence, and one bad. The good is bounty4 . Households will spend less on groceries, utilities and clothing; the deaf will be able to hear, the blind to see. The bad is spread5 . The gap is growing between the lucky few whose abilities and skills are enhanced6 by technology, and the far more numerous middle-skilled people competing for the remaining7 jobs that machines cannot do, such as folding towels and waiting at tables. (…) People should develop skills that complement, rather than compete with computers, such as idea generation and complex communication. (…)