Questõesde UNESP sobre Inglês

1
1
Foram encontradas 222 questões
ff2a6b6c-0a
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

A apresentação sublinha a influência de uma determinada vanguarda europeia sobre a pintura de Tarsila do Amaral. A influência dessa vanguarda europeia também se encontra nos seguintes versos do poeta modernista Murilo Mendes.

Entre 11 de fevereiro e 03 de junho de 2018, o Museu de Arte Moderna de Nova Iorque (MoMA) abrigou a primeira exposição nos Estados Unidos dedicada à pintora brasileira Tarsila do Amaral. Leia a apresentação de uma das pinturas expostas para responder às questões


The painting Sleep (1928) is a dreamlike representation of tropical landscape, with this major motif of her repetitive figure that disappears in the background.

This painting is an example of Tarsila’s venture into surrealism. Elements such as repetition, random association, and dreamlike figures are typical of surrealism that we can see as main elements of this composition. She was never a truly surrealist painter, but she was totally aware of surrealism’s legacy.


(www.moma.org. Adaptado.)

A

No fim de um ano seu Naum progrediu, já sabe que tem Rui Barbosa, Mangue, Lampião.
Joga no bicho todo dia, está ajuntando pro carnaval,
depois do almoço anda às turras com a mulher.
As filhas dele instalaram-se na vida nacional. Sabem dançar o maxixe
conversam com os sargentos em bom brasileiro.

(“Família russa no Brasil”)

B

Eu sou triste como um prático de farmácia,
sou quase tão triste como um homem que usa costeletas.
Passo o dia inteiro pensando nuns carinhos de mulher
mas só ouço o tectec das máquinas de escrever.
Lá fora chove e a estátua de Floriano fica linda.
Quantas meninas pela vida afora!
E eu alinhando no papel as fortunas dos outros


(“Modinha do empregado de banco”)

C

Ele acredita que o chão é duro
Que todos os homens estão presos
Que há limites para a poesia
Que não há sorrisos nas crianças
Nem amor nas mulheres
Que só de pão vive o homem
Que não há um outro mundo.

(“O utopista”)

D

A costureira, moça, alta, bonita,
ancas largas,
os seios estourando debaixo do vestido,
(os olhos profundos faziam a sombra na cara), morreu.
Desde então o viúvo passa os dias no quarto olhando pro
[manequim.

(“Afinidades”)

E

O cavalo mecânico arrebata o manequim pensativo
que invade a sombra das casas no espaço elástico.
Ao sinal do sonho a vida move direitinho as estátuas
que retomam seu lugar na série do planeta.
Os homens largam a ação na paisagem elementar
e invocam os pesadelos de mármore na beira do infinito

(“O mundo inimigo”)

ff2dfbdb-0a
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

De acordo com o artigo de Jason Farago, o “Manifesto Antropofágico”, escrito por Oswald de Andrade, foi influenciado

Leia o trecho do artigo de Jason Farago, publicado pelo jornal The New York Times, para responder às questões


She led Latin American Art in a bold new direction 


    In 1928, Tarsila do Amaral painted Abaporu, a landmark work of Brazilian Modernism, in which a nude figure, half-human and half-animal, looks down at his massive, swollen foot, several times the size of his head. Abaporu inspired Tarsila’s husband at the time, the poet Oswald de Andrade, to write his celebrated “Cannibal Manifesto,” which flayed Brazil’s belletrist writers and called for an embrace of local influences – in fact, for a devouring of them. The European stereotype of native Brazilians as cannibals would be reformatted as a cultural virtue. More than a social and literary reform movement, cannibalism would form the basis for a new Brazilian nationalism, in which, as de Andrade wrote, “we made Christ to be born in Bahia.” 

    The unconventional nudes of A Negra, a painting produced in 1923, and Abaporu unite in Tarsila’s final great painting, Antropofagia, a marriage of two figures that is also a marriage of Old World and New. The couple sit entangled, her breast drooping over his knee, their giant feet crossed one over the other, while, behind them, a banana leaf grows as large as a cactus. The sun, high above the primordial couple, is a wedge of lemon.


(Jason Farago. www.nytimes.com, 15.02.2018. Adaptado.)

A
pelo quadro Abaporu, produzido por Tarsila do Amaral em 1928.
B
pela exuberância das paisagens tropicais brasileiras.
C
pelo quadro Antropofagia, produzido antes da Semana de Arte Moderna. 
D
pelo estereótipo dos povos indígenas brasileiros.
E
pelo sincretismo religioso na Bahia e pelo primitivismo nas artes plásticas.
326b7b1d-58
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Tempos Verbais | Verb Tenses, Vocabulário | Vocabulary, Verbos modais | Modal verbs, Sinônimos | Synonyms

No trecho do quarto parágrafo “emotions may be the key to changing minds”, o termo sublinhado pode ser substituído, sem alteração de sentido no texto, por:

                      


      In today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!

      Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.

      Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.

      So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.

                                          (Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)

A
must.
B
has to.
C
can.
D
used to.
E
will.
32651a38-58
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

No trecho do segundo parágrafo “but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children”, o termo sublinhado refere-se a

                      


      In today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!

      Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.

      Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.

      So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.

                                          (Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)

A
“experts”.
B
“studies”.
C
“autism and vaccines”.
D
“parents”.
E
“myths”.
32682656-58
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

O trecho do terceiro parágrafo “we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise” quer dizer que as pessoas

                      


      In today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!

      Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.

      Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.

      So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.

                                          (Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)

A
não diferenciam opiniões de leigos das de especialistas.
B
não percebem a ideologia por trás das opiniões.
C
não conseguem avaliar posições contraditórias.
D
mudam de ideia com facilidade.
E
aceitam a opinião da maioria como válida.
3252234a-58
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

In the cartoon 1, the animal

Leia os cartuns 1 e 2 para responder à questão.


                    

A
agrees that it is easy to determine what fake news is.
B
confronts and criticizes the man’s point of view.
C
believes that sometimes lies should be recognized as truths
D
also thinks that fake news divide people.
E
explains the method it uses to discover what fake news is.
325519c7-58
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Tradução | Translation

Na fala do terceiro quadrinho do cartum 1 “Well, if it goes against my biases and beliefs, it’s fake”, o termo sublinhado equivale, em português, a

Leia os cartuns 1 e 2 para responder à questão.


                    

A
ordens.
B
pesquisas.
C
questionamentos.
D
inclinações.
E
sugestões.
32582cfd-58
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

No último quadrinho do cartum 1, por meio da fala “If you don’t pursue the truth, you’ll never recognize the lies”, o personagem

Leia os cartuns 1 e 2 para responder à questão.


                    

A
chega a meio-termo conciliatório.
B
respeita a opinião do interlocutor.
C
adverte o interlocutor.
D
mostra que os conflitos não interferem na amizade.
E
revê sua própria opinião.
324f10a7-58
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

Os homens dos cartuns 1 e 2

Leia os cartuns 1 e 2 para responder à questão.


                    

A
têm uma visão semelhante sobre o que consideram notícia falsa.
B
discordam sobre o que é verdadeiro ou falso na mídia.
C
consideram que a mídia deve garantir a veracidade das notícias.
D
estão preocupados com a proliferação de notícias falsas.
E
questionam se os valores pessoais alteram a compreensão das notícias.
325b76fe-58
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

De acordo com o texto, as pessoas

                      


      In today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!

      Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.

      Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.

      So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.

                                          (Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)

A
tendem a descartar fatos que conflitam com suas crenças.
B
são propensas a rejeitar quaisquer informações novas.
C
valorizam as opiniões de especialistas em um determinado assunto.
D
acreditam em fatos embasados em estatísticas e números.
E
estão cada vez mais dispostas a inventar conteúdo para ganhar dinheiro fácil.
3261c907-58
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

According to the second paragraph, the link between vaccines and autism

                      


      In today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!

      Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.

      Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.

      So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.

                                          (Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)

A
is accepted by both parents and experts.
B
is a true fact that worries most experts.
C
has been established by recent studies.
D
is a myth many people believe in.
E
has been shown in many young children.
325eb061-58
UNESP 2018 - Inglês - Vocabulário | Vocabulary

No trecho do primeiro parágrafo “A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt”, o termo sublinhado indica sentido de

                      


      In today’s political climate, it sometimes feels like we can’t even agree on basic facts. We bombard each other with statistics and figures, hoping that more data will make a difference. A progressive person might show you the same climate change graphs over and over while a conservative person might point to the trillions of dollars of growing national debt. We’re left wondering, “Why can’t they just see? It’s so obvious!

      Certain myths are so pervasive that no matter how many experts disprove them, they only seem to grow in popularity. There’s no shortage of serious studies showing no link between autism and vaccines, for example, but these are no match for an emotional appeal to parents worried for their young children.

      Tali Sharot, a cognitive neuroscientist at University College London, studies how our minds work and how we process new information. In her upcoming book, The Influential Mind, she explores why we ignore facts and how we can get people to actually listen to the truth. Tali shows that we’re open to new information – but only if it confirms our existing beliefs. We find ways to ignore facts that challenge our ideals. And as neuroscientist Bahador Bahrami and colleagues have found, we weigh all opinions as equally valid, regardless of expertise.

      So, having the data on your side is not always enough. For better or for worse, Sharot says, emotions may be the key to changing minds.

                                          (Shankar Vedantam. www.npr.org. Adaptado.)

A
alternativa.
B
tempo.
C
consequência.
D
preferência.
E
contraste.
336c0a02-1b
UNESP 2017 - Inglês - Tradução | Translation

No trecho do quarto parágrafo “while working according to your body’s natural clock”, o termo em destaque tem sentido, em português, de

                        When does the brain work best?

                     The peak times and ages for learning

                     

      What’s your ideal time of the day for brain performance? Surprisingly, the answer to this isn’t as simple as being a morning or a night person. New research has shown that certain times of the day are best for completing specific tasks, and listening to your body’s natural clock may help you to accomplish more in 24 hours.

      Science suggests that the best time for our natural peak productivity is late morning. Our body temperatures start to rise just before we wake up in the morning and continue to increase through midday, Steve Kay, a professor of molecular and computational biology at the University of Southern California told The Wall Street Journal. This gradual increase in body temperature means that our working memory, alertness, and concentration also gradually improve, peaking at about mid morning. Our alertness tends to dip after this point, but one study suggested that midday fatigue may actually boost our creative abilities. For a 2011 study, 428 students were asked to solve a series of two types of problems, requiring either analytical or novel thinking. Results showed that their performance on the second type was best at non-peak times of day when they were tired.

      As for the age where our brains are at peak condition, science has long held that fluid intelligence, or the ability to think quickly and recall information, peaks at around age 20. However, a 2015 study revealed that peak brain age is far more complicated than previously believed and concluded that there are about 30 subsets of intelligence, all of which peak at different ages for different people. For example, the study found that raw speed in processing information appears to peak around age 18 or 19, then immediately starts to decline, but short-term memory continues to improve until around age 25, and then begins to drop around age 35, Medical Xpress reported. The ability to evaluate other people’s emotional states peaked much later, in the 40s or 50s. In addition, the study suggested that out our vocabulary may peak as late as our 60s’s or 70’s.

      Still, while working according to your body’s natural clock may sound helpful, it’s important to remember that these times may differ from person to person. On average, people can be divided into two distinct groups: morning people tend to wake up and go to sleep earlier and to be most productive early in the day. Evening people tend to wake up later, start more slowly and peak in the evening. If being a morning or evening person has been working for you the majority of your life, it may be best to not fix what’s not broken.

           (Dana Dovey. www.medicaldaily.com, 08.08.2016. Adaptado.)

A
quando.
B
durante.
C
sobretudo.
D
mesmo que.
E
devido a.
336f2932-1b
UNESP 2017 - Inglês - Tradução | Translation

O trecho do quarto parágrafo “it may be best to not fix what’s not broken” equivale, em português, à seguinte ideia:

                        When does the brain work best?

                     The peak times and ages for learning

                     

      What’s your ideal time of the day for brain performance? Surprisingly, the answer to this isn’t as simple as being a morning or a night person. New research has shown that certain times of the day are best for completing specific tasks, and listening to your body’s natural clock may help you to accomplish more in 24 hours.

      Science suggests that the best time for our natural peak productivity is late morning. Our body temperatures start to rise just before we wake up in the morning and continue to increase through midday, Steve Kay, a professor of molecular and computational biology at the University of Southern California told The Wall Street Journal. This gradual increase in body temperature means that our working memory, alertness, and concentration also gradually improve, peaking at about mid morning. Our alertness tends to dip after this point, but one study suggested that midday fatigue may actually boost our creative abilities. For a 2011 study, 428 students were asked to solve a series of two types of problems, requiring either analytical or novel thinking. Results showed that their performance on the second type was best at non-peak times of day when they were tired.

      As for the age where our brains are at peak condition, science has long held that fluid intelligence, or the ability to think quickly and recall information, peaks at around age 20. However, a 2015 study revealed that peak brain age is far more complicated than previously believed and concluded that there are about 30 subsets of intelligence, all of which peak at different ages for different people. For example, the study found that raw speed in processing information appears to peak around age 18 or 19, then immediately starts to decline, but short-term memory continues to improve until around age 25, and then begins to drop around age 35, Medical Xpress reported. The ability to evaluate other people’s emotional states peaked much later, in the 40s or 50s. In addition, the study suggested that out our vocabulary may peak as late as our 60s’s or 70’s.

      Still, while working according to your body’s natural clock may sound helpful, it’s important to remember that these times may differ from person to person. On average, people can be divided into two distinct groups: morning people tend to wake up and go to sleep earlier and to be most productive early in the day. Evening people tend to wake up later, start more slowly and peak in the evening. If being a morning or evening person has been working for you the majority of your life, it may be best to not fix what’s not broken.

           (Dana Dovey. www.medicaldaily.com, 08.08.2016. Adaptado.)

A
é melhor prevenir do que remediar.
B
vaso ruim não quebra.
C
uma vez quebrado, não adianta consertar.
D
se não tem solução, solucionado está.
E
não se mexe em time que está ganhando.
33690512-1b
UNESP 2017 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

As informações apresentadas no quarto parágrafo

                        When does the brain work best?

                     The peak times and ages for learning

                     

      What’s your ideal time of the day for brain performance? Surprisingly, the answer to this isn’t as simple as being a morning or a night person. New research has shown that certain times of the day are best for completing specific tasks, and listening to your body’s natural clock may help you to accomplish more in 24 hours.

      Science suggests that the best time for our natural peak productivity is late morning. Our body temperatures start to rise just before we wake up in the morning and continue to increase through midday, Steve Kay, a professor of molecular and computational biology at the University of Southern California told The Wall Street Journal. This gradual increase in body temperature means that our working memory, alertness, and concentration also gradually improve, peaking at about mid morning. Our alertness tends to dip after this point, but one study suggested that midday fatigue may actually boost our creative abilities. For a 2011 study, 428 students were asked to solve a series of two types of problems, requiring either analytical or novel thinking. Results showed that their performance on the second type was best at non-peak times of day when they were tired.

      As for the age where our brains are at peak condition, science has long held that fluid intelligence, or the ability to think quickly and recall information, peaks at around age 20. However, a 2015 study revealed that peak brain age is far more complicated than previously believed and concluded that there are about 30 subsets of intelligence, all of which peak at different ages for different people. For example, the study found that raw speed in processing information appears to peak around age 18 or 19, then immediately starts to decline, but short-term memory continues to improve until around age 25, and then begins to drop around age 35, Medical Xpress reported. The ability to evaluate other people’s emotional states peaked much later, in the 40s or 50s. In addition, the study suggested that out our vocabulary may peak as late as our 60s’s or 70’s.

      Still, while working according to your body’s natural clock may sound helpful, it’s important to remember that these times may differ from person to person. On average, people can be divided into two distinct groups: morning people tend to wake up and go to sleep earlier and to be most productive early in the day. Evening people tend to wake up later, start more slowly and peak in the evening. If being a morning or evening person has been working for you the majority of your life, it may be best to not fix what’s not broken.

           (Dana Dovey. www.medicaldaily.com, 08.08.2016. Adaptado.)

A
indicam que o grupo das pessoas que acordam cedo tem melhor desempenho no trabalho.
B
alertam que as pessoas com hábitos noturnos podem ter dificuldades de adaptação às atividades criativas.
C
afirmam que quem acorda tarde, geralmente, tem raciocínio lento.
D
relativizam o estudo que afirma que o final da manhã é o melhor período para a atividade cerebral.
E
revelam que, mesmo considerando as diferenças individuais, há dois tipos de raciocínio analítico.
3365e74e-1b
UNESP 2017 - Inglês - Palavras conectivas | Connective words

No trecho do terceiro parágrafo “However, a 2015 study revealed”, o termo em destaque pode ser substituído, sem alteração de sentido, por

                        When does the brain work best?

                     The peak times and ages for learning

                     

      What’s your ideal time of the day for brain performance? Surprisingly, the answer to this isn’t as simple as being a morning or a night person. New research has shown that certain times of the day are best for completing specific tasks, and listening to your body’s natural clock may help you to accomplish more in 24 hours.

      Science suggests that the best time for our natural peak productivity is late morning. Our body temperatures start to rise just before we wake up in the morning and continue to increase through midday, Steve Kay, a professor of molecular and computational biology at the University of Southern California told The Wall Street Journal. This gradual increase in body temperature means that our working memory, alertness, and concentration also gradually improve, peaking at about mid morning. Our alertness tends to dip after this point, but one study suggested that midday fatigue may actually boost our creative abilities. For a 2011 study, 428 students were asked to solve a series of two types of problems, requiring either analytical or novel thinking. Results showed that their performance on the second type was best at non-peak times of day when they were tired.

      As for the age where our brains are at peak condition, science has long held that fluid intelligence, or the ability to think quickly and recall information, peaks at around age 20. However, a 2015 study revealed that peak brain age is far more complicated than previously believed and concluded that there are about 30 subsets of intelligence, all of which peak at different ages for different people. For example, the study found that raw speed in processing information appears to peak around age 18 or 19, then immediately starts to decline, but short-term memory continues to improve until around age 25, and then begins to drop around age 35, Medical Xpress reported. The ability to evaluate other people’s emotional states peaked much later, in the 40s or 50s. In addition, the study suggested that out our vocabulary may peak as late as our 60s’s or 70’s.

      Still, while working according to your body’s natural clock may sound helpful, it’s important to remember that these times may differ from person to person. On average, people can be divided into two distinct groups: morning people tend to wake up and go to sleep earlier and to be most productive early in the day. Evening people tend to wake up later, start more slowly and peak in the evening. If being a morning or evening person has been working for you the majority of your life, it may be best to not fix what’s not broken.

           (Dana Dovey. www.medicaldaily.com, 08.08.2016. Adaptado.)

A
although.
B
nevertheless.
C
inasmuch.
D
meanwhile.
E
whatever.
3362ed78-1b
UNESP 2017 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

De acordo com o terceiro parágrafo, o estudo de 2015

                        When does the brain work best?

                     The peak times and ages for learning

                     

      What’s your ideal time of the day for brain performance? Surprisingly, the answer to this isn’t as simple as being a morning or a night person. New research has shown that certain times of the day are best for completing specific tasks, and listening to your body’s natural clock may help you to accomplish more in 24 hours.

      Science suggests that the best time for our natural peak productivity is late morning. Our body temperatures start to rise just before we wake up in the morning and continue to increase through midday, Steve Kay, a professor of molecular and computational biology at the University of Southern California told The Wall Street Journal. This gradual increase in body temperature means that our working memory, alertness, and concentration also gradually improve, peaking at about mid morning. Our alertness tends to dip after this point, but one study suggested that midday fatigue may actually boost our creative abilities. For a 2011 study, 428 students were asked to solve a series of two types of problems, requiring either analytical or novel thinking. Results showed that their performance on the second type was best at non-peak times of day when they were tired.

      As for the age where our brains are at peak condition, science has long held that fluid intelligence, or the ability to think quickly and recall information, peaks at around age 20. However, a 2015 study revealed that peak brain age is far more complicated than previously believed and concluded that there are about 30 subsets of intelligence, all of which peak at different ages for different people. For example, the study found that raw speed in processing information appears to peak around age 18 or 19, then immediately starts to decline, but short-term memory continues to improve until around age 25, and then begins to drop around age 35, Medical Xpress reported. The ability to evaluate other people’s emotional states peaked much later, in the 40s or 50s. In addition, the study suggested that out our vocabulary may peak as late as our 60s’s or 70’s.

      Still, while working according to your body’s natural clock may sound helpful, it’s important to remember that these times may differ from person to person. On average, people can be divided into two distinct groups: morning people tend to wake up and go to sleep earlier and to be most productive early in the day. Evening people tend to wake up later, start more slowly and peak in the evening. If being a morning or evening person has been working for you the majority of your life, it may be best to not fix what’s not broken.

           (Dana Dovey. www.medicaldaily.com, 08.08.2016. Adaptado.)

A
confirma que o vocabulário das pessoas se desenvolve até cerca dos 60 anos de idade.
B
infere que o processo de elaboração da inteligência emocional dura a vida toda.
C
contradiz a ideia de que a inteligência fluida atinge o ápice por volta dos 20 anos de idade.
D
mostra que a velocidade de processamento de informações no cérebro atinge o máximo dos 25 aos 35 anos.
E
demonstra que vários tipos de inteligência se desenvolvem aos 30 anos de idade.
335c9106-1b
UNESP 2017 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

According to the first and second paragraphs, the brain performance peaks in late morning because

                        When does the brain work best?

                     The peak times and ages for learning

                     

      What’s your ideal time of the day for brain performance? Surprisingly, the answer to this isn’t as simple as being a morning or a night person. New research has shown that certain times of the day are best for completing specific tasks, and listening to your body’s natural clock may help you to accomplish more in 24 hours.

      Science suggests that the best time for our natural peak productivity is late morning. Our body temperatures start to rise just before we wake up in the morning and continue to increase through midday, Steve Kay, a professor of molecular and computational biology at the University of Southern California told The Wall Street Journal. This gradual increase in body temperature means that our working memory, alertness, and concentration also gradually improve, peaking at about mid morning. Our alertness tends to dip after this point, but one study suggested that midday fatigue may actually boost our creative abilities. For a 2011 study, 428 students were asked to solve a series of two types of problems, requiring either analytical or novel thinking. Results showed that their performance on the second type was best at non-peak times of day when they were tired.

      As for the age where our brains are at peak condition, science has long held that fluid intelligence, or the ability to think quickly and recall information, peaks at around age 20. However, a 2015 study revealed that peak brain age is far more complicated than previously believed and concluded that there are about 30 subsets of intelligence, all of which peak at different ages for different people. For example, the study found that raw speed in processing information appears to peak around age 18 or 19, then immediately starts to decline, but short-term memory continues to improve until around age 25, and then begins to drop around age 35, Medical Xpress reported. The ability to evaluate other people’s emotional states peaked much later, in the 40s or 50s. In addition, the study suggested that out our vocabulary may peak as late as our 60s’s or 70’s.

      Still, while working according to your body’s natural clock may sound helpful, it’s important to remember that these times may differ from person to person. On average, people can be divided into two distinct groups: morning people tend to wake up and go to sleep earlier and to be most productive early in the day. Evening people tend to wake up later, start more slowly and peak in the evening. If being a morning or evening person has been working for you the majority of your life, it may be best to not fix what’s not broken.

           (Dana Dovey. www.medicaldaily.com, 08.08.2016. Adaptado.)

A
body temperature gets higher at this time of the day.
B
specific tasks stimulate the brain.
C
most people wake up quite early.
D
it’s easier to solve problems in the morning than at midday.
E
human natural rhythm reaches a steady level.
335faa1a-1b
UNESP 2017 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

According to the second paragraph, the 2011 study showed that

                        When does the brain work best?

                     The peak times and ages for learning

                     

      What’s your ideal time of the day for brain performance? Surprisingly, the answer to this isn’t as simple as being a morning or a night person. New research has shown that certain times of the day are best for completing specific tasks, and listening to your body’s natural clock may help you to accomplish more in 24 hours.

      Science suggests that the best time for our natural peak productivity is late morning. Our body temperatures start to rise just before we wake up in the morning and continue to increase through midday, Steve Kay, a professor of molecular and computational biology at the University of Southern California told The Wall Street Journal. This gradual increase in body temperature means that our working memory, alertness, and concentration also gradually improve, peaking at about mid morning. Our alertness tends to dip after this point, but one study suggested that midday fatigue may actually boost our creative abilities. For a 2011 study, 428 students were asked to solve a series of two types of problems, requiring either analytical or novel thinking. Results showed that their performance on the second type was best at non-peak times of day when they were tired.

      As for the age where our brains are at peak condition, science has long held that fluid intelligence, or the ability to think quickly and recall information, peaks at around age 20. However, a 2015 study revealed that peak brain age is far more complicated than previously believed and concluded that there are about 30 subsets of intelligence, all of which peak at different ages for different people. For example, the study found that raw speed in processing information appears to peak around age 18 or 19, then immediately starts to decline, but short-term memory continues to improve until around age 25, and then begins to drop around age 35, Medical Xpress reported. The ability to evaluate other people’s emotional states peaked much later, in the 40s or 50s. In addition, the study suggested that out our vocabulary may peak as late as our 60s’s or 70’s.

      Still, while working according to your body’s natural clock may sound helpful, it’s important to remember that these times may differ from person to person. On average, people can be divided into two distinct groups: morning people tend to wake up and go to sleep earlier and to be most productive early in the day. Evening people tend to wake up later, start more slowly and peak in the evening. If being a morning or evening person has been working for you the majority of your life, it may be best to not fix what’s not broken.

           (Dana Dovey. www.medicaldaily.com, 08.08.2016. Adaptado.)

A
both analytical and novel thinking were better accomplished before midday
B
most people feel a midday fatigue.
C
alertness quickly decreases after the brain peaks.
D
most of the 428 students felt tired early in the morning.
E
novel thinking was better when the brain was at non-peak times.
335941d8-1b
UNESP 2017 - Inglês - Sinônimos | Synonyms

No trecho do terceiro quadrinho “We’re not that dumb!”, o termo em destaque pode ser substituído, sem alteração de sentido, por

Examine a tira para responder à questão.


              

A
so.
B
which.
C
over.
D
more.
E
quite.