Questõesde CEDERJ 2015

1
1
Foram encontradas 79 questões
7474f854-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    According to the text, friends who are always in trouble because they do not follow our advice should be treated with

Why don’t we take our own advice?
Oliver Burkeman

“Why is it so hard to take your own advice?” the psychology writer Melissa Dahl asked in a New York magazine essay some months ago, and the question’s been bugging me ever since. I have the arrogance to imagine that if you followed some of the suggestions made each week in this column, you might be a little happier or more productive, with a little less relationship drama, a little more inner calm. (From my email inbox, I know this happens at least occasionally.) But were you to infer from this that I follow such advice flawlessly myself, you’d be mistaken. When friends mention their difficulties with partners or bosses, Dahl wrote, she always tells them to talk to the person involved. Just say something! “And probably, this is good advice,” she mused. “I wouldn’t know, as it’s something I rarely do myself.” I can understand. I suspect most of us can. As the old wisecrack has it: “Take my advice – I’m not using it.”
The cynical take on this is that we ignore our own advice because it’s rubbish: we give it to seem wise, when in fact it’s nonsense. (All advice to “try harder” or “snap out of it” or “look on the bright side” fall into this category: if the recipient could do so, he or she already would have, without your so-called help.)
But a more interesting notion is that the advice is often good – yet something prevents us applying it to ourselves. One such obstacle is simply too much information: inside our own heads, we have access to all manner of details, making us believe that this relationship problem, this job dilemma, is special, so the advice doesn’t apply. Dahl cites work by the psychologist Dan Ariely, showing that when a friend gets a serious medical diagnosis, most people would urge them to get a second opinion. But were it to happen to themselves, they’d be more likely not to do so, for fear of offending their doctor. The fear of offence is something you’d think of only in your own case – and it’s totally unhelpful.
But there’s another big reason I don’t follow my own advice: the huge gulf between grasping something intellectually and really feeling it in your bones. For example, it was years ago that I first encountered the insight that anxiety and insecurity aren’t reduced by trying to exert more control over the world; in fact, that usually makes them worse. I know this. But apparently I have to keep learning it, over and over. Its correctness isn’t sufficient for it to get into my brain once and for all; that takes repeated experience. As a result, I continue to “suddenly realise” things I already wrote an entire book about.
If nothing else, this should be a caution against getting too frustrated with that one friend of yours who keeps getting into the same kind of pickle, time and again, deaf to the obviously good advice that everyone keeps offering. You know the type. We’ve all got a friend like that. The 
scary thought is that, for some of your friends, it’s probably you.

Adapted from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/sep/11/ taking-your-own-advice-oliver-burkeman. Accessed on: 22 out. 2015.

Glossary
advice: conselho; to bug: incomodar; to infer: concluir; flawlessly: perfeitamente; to muse: meditar; wisecrack: espertinho; cynical: cínico, pessimista; rubbish: besteira; to urge: insistir; gulf: distância; exert: exercer; pickle: encrenca
A
fear.
B
frustration.
C
tolerance.
D
indifference.
746dbd29-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Inglês - Advérbios e conjunções | Adverbs and conjunctions

    In the second paragraph, in the sentence “we give it to seem wise, when in fact it's nonsense", the conjunction “when" introduces an idea of

Why don’t we take our own advice?
Oliver Burkeman

“Why is it so hard to take your own advice?” the psychology writer Melissa Dahl asked in a New York magazine essay some months ago, and the question’s been bugging me ever since. I have the arrogance to imagine that if you followed some of the suggestions made each week in this column, you might be a little happier or more productive, with a little less relationship drama, a little more inner calm. (From my email inbox, I know this happens at least occasionally.) But were you to infer from this that I follow such advice flawlessly myself, you’d be mistaken. When friends mention their difficulties with partners or bosses, Dahl wrote, she always tells them to talk to the person involved. Just say something! “And probably, this is good advice,” she mused. “I wouldn’t know, as it’s something I rarely do myself.” I can understand. I suspect most of us can. As the old wisecrack has it: “Take my advice – I’m not using it.”
The cynical take on this is that we ignore our own advice because it’s rubbish: we give it to seem wise, when in fact it’s nonsense. (All advice to “try harder” or “snap out of it” or “look on the bright side” fall into this category: if the recipient could do so, he or she already would have, without your so-called help.)
But a more interesting notion is that the advice is often good – yet something prevents us applying it to ourselves. One such obstacle is simply too much information: inside our own heads, we have access to all manner of details, making us believe that this relationship problem, this job dilemma, is special, so the advice doesn’t apply. Dahl cites work by the psychologist Dan Ariely, showing that when a friend gets a serious medical diagnosis, most people would urge them to get a second opinion. But were it to happen to themselves, they’d be more likely not to do so, for fear of offending their doctor. The fear of offence is something you’d think of only in your own case – and it’s totally unhelpful.
But there’s another big reason I don’t follow my own advice: the huge gulf between grasping something intellectually and really feeling it in your bones. For example, it was years ago that I first encountered the insight that anxiety and insecurity aren’t reduced by trying to exert more control over the world; in fact, that usually makes them worse. I know this. But apparently I have to keep learning it, over and over. Its correctness isn’t sufficient for it to get into my brain once and for all; that takes repeated experience. As a result, I continue to “suddenly realise” things I already wrote an entire book about.
If nothing else, this should be a caution against getting too frustrated with that one friend of yours who keeps getting into the same kind of pickle, time and again, deaf to the obviously good advice that everyone keeps offering. You know the type. We’ve all got a friend like that. The 
scary thought is that, for some of your friends, it’s probably you.

Adapted from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/sep/11/ taking-your-own-advice-oliver-burkeman. Accessed on: 22 out. 2015.

Glossary
advice: conselho; to bug: incomodar; to infer: concluir; flawlessly: perfeitamente; to muse: meditar; wisecrack: espertinho; cynical: cínico, pessimista; rubbish: besteira; to urge: insistir; gulf: distância; exert: exercer; pickle: encrenca
A
opposition.
B
condition.
C
duration.
D
consequence.
7467ed07-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    De acordo com o que autor afirma no quarto parágrafo do texto, a tentativa de controlar o mundo

Why don’t we take our own advice?
Oliver Burkeman

“Why is it so hard to take your own advice?” the psychology writer Melissa Dahl asked in a New York magazine essay some months ago, and the question’s been bugging me ever since. I have the arrogance to imagine that if you followed some of the suggestions made each week in this column, you might be a little happier or more productive, with a little less relationship drama, a little more inner calm. (From my email inbox, I know this happens at least occasionally.) But were you to infer from this that I follow such advice flawlessly myself, you’d be mistaken. When friends mention their difficulties with partners or bosses, Dahl wrote, she always tells them to talk to the person involved. Just say something! “And probably, this is good advice,” she mused. “I wouldn’t know, as it’s something I rarely do myself.” I can understand. I suspect most of us can. As the old wisecrack has it: “Take my advice – I’m not using it.”
The cynical take on this is that we ignore our own advice because it’s rubbish: we give it to seem wise, when in fact it’s nonsense. (All advice to “try harder” or “snap out of it” or “look on the bright side” fall into this category: if the recipient could do so, he or she already would have, without your so-called help.)
But a more interesting notion is that the advice is often good – yet something prevents us applying it to ourselves. One such obstacle is simply too much information: inside our own heads, we have access to all manner of details, making us believe that this relationship problem, this job dilemma, is special, so the advice doesn’t apply. Dahl cites work by the psychologist Dan Ariely, showing that when a friend gets a serious medical diagnosis, most people would urge them to get a second opinion. But were it to happen to themselves, they’d be more likely not to do so, for fear of offending their doctor. The fear of offence is something you’d think of only in your own case – and it’s totally unhelpful.
But there’s another big reason I don’t follow my own advice: the huge gulf between grasping something intellectually and really feeling it in your bones. For example, it was years ago that I first encountered the insight that anxiety and insecurity aren’t reduced by trying to exert more control over the world; in fact, that usually makes them worse. I know this. But apparently I have to keep learning it, over and over. Its correctness isn’t sufficient for it to get into my brain once and for all; that takes repeated experience. As a result, I continue to “suddenly realise” things I already wrote an entire book about.
If nothing else, this should be a caution against getting too frustrated with that one friend of yours who keeps getting into the same kind of pickle, time and again, deaf to the obviously good advice that everyone keeps offering. You know the type. We’ve all got a friend like that. The 
scary thought is that, for some of your friends, it’s probably you.

Adapted from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/sep/11/ taking-your-own-advice-oliver-burkeman. Accessed on: 22 out. 2015.

Glossary
advice: conselho; to bug: incomodar; to infer: concluir; flawlessly: perfeitamente; to muse: meditar; wisecrack: espertinho; cynical: cínico, pessimista; rubbish: besteira; to urge: insistir; gulf: distância; exert: exercer; pickle: encrenca
A
combate a insegurança e a ansiedade.
B
revela insegurança e ansiedade.
C
intensifica a insegurança e a ansiedade.
D
resulta da insegurança e da ansiedade.
7463bbe7-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Segundo o autor do texto, no terceiro parágrafo, muitas vezes não seguimos o nosso próprio conselho porque

Why don’t we take our own advice?
Oliver Burkeman

“Why is it so hard to take your own advice?” the psychology writer Melissa Dahl asked in a New York magazine essay some months ago, and the question’s been bugging me ever since. I have the arrogance to imagine that if you followed some of the suggestions made each week in this column, you might be a little happier or more productive, with a little less relationship drama, a little more inner calm. (From my email inbox, I know this happens at least occasionally.) But were you to infer from this that I follow such advice flawlessly myself, you’d be mistaken. When friends mention their difficulties with partners or bosses, Dahl wrote, she always tells them to talk to the person involved. Just say something! “And probably, this is good advice,” she mused. “I wouldn’t know, as it’s something I rarely do myself.” I can understand. I suspect most of us can. As the old wisecrack has it: “Take my advice – I’m not using it.”
The cynical take on this is that we ignore our own advice because it’s rubbish: we give it to seem wise, when in fact it’s nonsense. (All advice to “try harder” or “snap out of it” or “look on the bright side” fall into this category: if the recipient could do so, he or she already would have, without your so-called help.)
But a more interesting notion is that the advice is often good – yet something prevents us applying it to ourselves. One such obstacle is simply too much information: inside our own heads, we have access to all manner of details, making us believe that this relationship problem, this job dilemma, is special, so the advice doesn’t apply. Dahl cites work by the psychologist Dan Ariely, showing that when a friend gets a serious medical diagnosis, most people would urge them to get a second opinion. But were it to happen to themselves, they’d be more likely not to do so, for fear of offending their doctor. The fear of offence is something you’d think of only in your own case – and it’s totally unhelpful.
But there’s another big reason I don’t follow my own advice: the huge gulf between grasping something intellectually and really feeling it in your bones. For example, it was years ago that I first encountered the insight that anxiety and insecurity aren’t reduced by trying to exert more control over the world; in fact, that usually makes them worse. I know this. But apparently I have to keep learning it, over and over. Its correctness isn’t sufficient for it to get into my brain once and for all; that takes repeated experience. As a result, I continue to “suddenly realise” things I already wrote an entire book about.
If nothing else, this should be a caution against getting too frustrated with that one friend of yours who keeps getting into the same kind of pickle, time and again, deaf to the obviously good advice that everyone keeps offering. You know the type. We’ve all got a friend like that. The 
scary thought is that, for some of your friends, it’s probably you.

Adapted from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/sep/11/ taking-your-own-advice-oliver-burkeman. Accessed on: 22 out. 2015.

Glossary
advice: conselho; to bug: incomodar; to infer: concluir; flawlessly: perfeitamente; to muse: meditar; wisecrack: espertinho; cynical: cínico, pessimista; rubbish: besteira; to urge: insistir; gulf: distância; exert: exercer; pickle: encrenca
A
tememos nos ferir ao mudar o nosso comportamento.
B
sabemos que na verdade ele é ruim.
C
preferimos seguir a orientação de especialistas.
D
temos informações que dificultam sua aplicação.
745d1469-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Inglês - Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

    Diante da confissão da especialista em psicologia Melissa Dahl de que ela própria raramente segue os seus próprios conselhos, o autor do texto, Oliver Burkeman, reage com

Why don’t we take our own advice?
Oliver Burkeman

“Why is it so hard to take your own advice?” the psychology writer Melissa Dahl asked in a New York magazine essay some months ago, and the question’s been bugging me ever since. I have the arrogance to imagine that if you followed some of the suggestions made each week in this column, you might be a little happier or more productive, with a little less relationship drama, a little more inner calm. (From my email inbox, I know this happens at least occasionally.) But were you to infer from this that I follow such advice flawlessly myself, you’d be mistaken. When friends mention their difficulties with partners or bosses, Dahl wrote, she always tells them to talk to the person involved. Just say something! “And probably, this is good advice,” she mused. “I wouldn’t know, as it’s something I rarely do myself.” I can understand. I suspect most of us can. As the old wisecrack has it: “Take my advice – I’m not using it.”
The cynical take on this is that we ignore our own advice because it’s rubbish: we give it to seem wise, when in fact it’s nonsense. (All advice to “try harder” or “snap out of it” or “look on the bright side” fall into this category: if the recipient could do so, he or she already would have, without your so-called help.)
But a more interesting notion is that the advice is often good – yet something prevents us applying it to ourselves. One such obstacle is simply too much information: inside our own heads, we have access to all manner of details, making us believe that this relationship problem, this job dilemma, is special, so the advice doesn’t apply. Dahl cites work by the psychologist Dan Ariely, showing that when a friend gets a serious medical diagnosis, most people would urge them to get a second opinion. But were it to happen to themselves, they’d be more likely not to do so, for fear of offending their doctor. The fear of offence is something you’d think of only in your own case – and it’s totally unhelpful.
But there’s another big reason I don’t follow my own advice: the huge gulf between grasping something intellectually and really feeling it in your bones. For example, it was years ago that I first encountered the insight that anxiety and insecurity aren’t reduced by trying to exert more control over the world; in fact, that usually makes them worse. I know this. But apparently I have to keep learning it, over and over. Its correctness isn’t sufficient for it to get into my brain once and for all; that takes repeated experience. As a result, I continue to “suddenly realise” things I already wrote an entire book about.
If nothing else, this should be a caution against getting too frustrated with that one friend of yours who keeps getting into the same kind of pickle, time and again, deaf to the obviously good advice that everyone keeps offering. You know the type. We’ve all got a friend like that. The 
scary thought is that, for some of your friends, it’s probably you.

Adapted from http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/2015/sep/11/ taking-your-own-advice-oliver-burkeman. Accessed on: 22 out. 2015.

Glossary
advice: conselho; to bug: incomodar; to infer: concluir; flawlessly: perfeitamente; to muse: meditar; wisecrack: espertinho; cynical: cínico, pessimista; rubbish: besteira; to urge: insistir; gulf: distância; exert: exercer; pickle: encrenca
A
irritação.
B
solidariedade.
C
superioridade.
D
incredulidade.
74588c57-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Química - Transformações Químicas: elementos químicos, tabela periódica e reações químicas, Transformações Químicas, Soluções e Substâncias Inorgânicas, Substâncias Inorgânicas e suas características: Ácidos, Bases, Sais e Óxidos. Reações de Neutralização.

    Para evitar bolor em armários, utilizam-se produtos denominados “sais secantes", como o CaCl2 anidro, que é higroscópico, isto é, capaz de absorver moléculas de água. Por essa razão, o frasco contendo este secante acaba por acumular líquido no fundo, que nada mais é do que solução aquosa de cloreto de cálcio. Com base nessa informação e utilizando – caso necessário – a tabela periódica, analise as afirmativas a seguir:

I O cloreto de cálcio é um sólido iônico.
II O cloreto de cálcio sólido é um bom condutor de eletricidade.
III Para ser usado como “secante de armário", o sal deve ser higroscópico.

São verdadeiras:

A
apenas I e II.
B
apenas I e III.
C
apenas II e III.
D
I, II e III.
744fc45f-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Química - Soluções e Substâncias Inorgânicas, Substâncias Inorgânicas e suas características: Ácidos, Bases, Sais e Óxidos. Reações de Neutralização.

    Segundo a teoria eletrolítica de Arrhenius, que considera o comportamento das substâncias quando dissolvidas em água, a função inorgânica dos sais pode ser definida da seguinte forma: Sal é toda substância que, em solução aquosa, sofre dissociação, liberando pelo menos um cátion diferente do H+ ou H3O+ e um aníon diferente do OH- .

O sal formado entre o ácido bórico e o hidróxido de magnésio apresenta a seguinte composição centesimal:

A
Mg = 37.89%; B = 11.58%; O = 50.53%
B
Mg = 54.96%; B = 8.40%; O = 36.64%
C
Mg = 16.90%; B = 15.49%; O = 67.61%
D
Mg = 54.96%; B = 11.58%; O = 36.64%
744b2d3e-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Química - Equilíbrio Químico, Sistemas Homogêneos: Constantes: Kc e Kp. Deslocamento do Equilíbrio: Fatores.

    Considere as condições de remoção de Cl2 , adição de PCl3 e diminuição do volume do recipiente que estão relacionadas com a reação

PCl3(g) + Cl2(g) PCl5(g)

Sob essas condições, o efeito causado sobre a referida reação é:

A
Deslocamento para a direita e, consequentemente, diminuição da concentração de PCl5.
B
Deslocamento para a esquerda; logo, diminuição da concentração de PCl5.
C
Favorecimento da reação que produz o maior número de moléculas, no caso PCl5.
D
Favorecimento de manutenção da posição de equilíbrio.
74543e28-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Química - Equilíbrio Químico, Sistemas Homogêneos: Equilíbrio Químico na Água: pH e pOH, Indicadores Ácido-Base, Solução Tampão., Sistemas Heterogêneos: Produto de Solubilidade (Kps)., Sistemas Homogêneos: Equilíbrio Iônico: Conceitos, Diluição de Ostwald, Efeito do Íon Comum.

    O efeito íon comum decorre da diminuição da solubilidade de um sal ao se agregar um dos íons. O aumento da concentração de um dos íons que formam o precipitado deve corresponder à diminuição da do outro, para que o Kps permaneça constante, a uma temperatura determinada. Esse efeito é o que permite reduzir a solubilidade de muitos precipitados ou precipitar, quantitativamente, um íon, usando excesso de agente precipitante. O valor do Kps do hidróxido de magnésio é 8.9 x 10-12, a 25.0°C.

A solubilidade desse composto a 25.0°C, em água pura e em uma solução de pH igual a 13.00, será, respectivamente, em molL-1 :

A
1.3 x 10-4 e 8.9 x 10-10
B
2.1 x 10-6 e 2.9 x 10-6
C
8.9 x 10-4 e 2.9 x 10-6
D
4.5 x 10-12 e 2.9 x 10-12
74462fc9-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Química - Transformações Químicas e Energia, Eletroquímica: Oxirredução, Potenciais Padrão de Redução, Pilha, Eletrólise e Leis de Faraday.

    Define-se por eletrólise o processo no qual se induz no sistema, artificial e forçadamente, uma corrente – seja ela elétrica ou química – a fim de se obter uma reação química, convertendo energia elétrica em energia química ou vice-versa. Em resumo, quando dois compostos entram em contato químico, seus elementos são separados, de modo forçado, através da corrente elétrica de energia química.

Em relação à eletrólise,

A
o polo positivo é o anodo, em que ocorre a reducão.
B
a aquosa é aquela em que não há dissociação de um composto iônico em solução e onde o eletrodo tem que ser inerte.
C
a ígnea é aquela em que não há presença de água e onde metais iônicos são fundidos e se ionizam formando íons.
D
o polo positivo é o catodo, em que ocorre a oxidação.
743c3a4e-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Matemática - Aritmética e Problemas, Potenciação, Álgebra, Sistemas de Numeração e Operações Fundamentais, Radiciação, Funções, Equações Exponenciais

A alternativa que apresenta uma sentença verdadeira é:

A
O produto de dois números reais é sempre maior do que cada um dos fatores.
B
3x > 2x para todo valor real de x.
C


D
Se 0 < x < 1, então x2 < x.
74410f92-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Matemática - Relações Métricas no Triângulo Retângulo, Geometria Plana

Em um triângulo retângulo, a altura relativa à hipotenusa mede 12 cm, e o menor dos segmentos que ela determina sobre a hipotenusa mede 9 cm. A medida do menor cateto é:

A
15 cm
B
16 cm
C
20 cm
D
25 cm
74357edd-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Matemática - Potenciação, Álgebra, Matrizes, Produtos Notáveis e Fatoração, Álgebra Linear

Considere as sentenças:

I O produto das matrizes A = é a matriz nula de ordem 2.
II O número x = 250.320.530.710 é divisível por 310.
III Sendo x e y números reais não nulos, então .
É correto afirmar que:

A
Todas são verdadeiras.
B
Todas são falsas.
C
Apenas II é verdadeira.
D
Apenas III é falsa.
742ab3c3-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Matemática - Sistemas de Numeração e Operações Fundamentais

A soma de todos os números inteiros entre 50 e 350 que terminam em 3 é:

A
5940
B
6000
C
6336
D
6400
742ef5b1-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - Matemática - Aritmética e Problemas, Potenciação, Álgebra, Sistemas de Numeração e Operações Fundamentais




A
1/4
B
1/2
C
2
D
4
7425da80-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - História - República Autoritária : 1964- 1984, História do Brasil

A imagem reforça a relação da ditatura com o patriotismo expresso na bandeira:



Sobre a Ditadura Militar Brasileira, é correto afirmar que:

A
Castelo Branco foi o presidente que mais reprimiu a população.
B
O governo Médici minimizou a repressão à luta armada.
C
As greves operárias foram reprimidas ao longo da Ditadura.
D
A abertura foi o resultado de um acordo restrito entre militares e burgueses.
741d0ef2-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - História - História do Brasil, Era Vargas – 1930-1954

Na Era Vargas, a batalha pela democratização do Brasil ganhou muita força. Esse processo

A
atestou o poder dos camponeses no âmbito da redemocratização.
B
certificou o apoio da população ao Presidente Getúlio Vargas
C
significou o derradeiro fim dos interesses das oligarquias.
D
expressou o irrefutável fracasso dos movimentos operários.
741542f8-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - História - História do Brasil, Brasil Monárquico – Segundo Reinado 1831- 1889

“É a voz de um partido que se alça para falar ao país. E esse partido não carece demonstrar a sua legitimidade. Desde que a reforma, alteração ou revogação da carta outorgada de 1824, está por ela mesma revista e autorizada, é legítima a aspiração que hoje se manifesta para buscar em melhor origem o fundamento dos inauferíveis direitos da nação. (...) Não reconhecendo nós outra soberania mais do que a soberania do povo, para ela apelamos. (...) (A República. Rio de Janeiro, 3 de dezembro de 1870.)

O Manifesto Republicano é, para muitos historiadores, um singular documento político, publicado no Brasil em 1870. Por conseguinte, o Manifesto Republicano

A
advoga em defesa do fim da escravidão.
B
expressa os desejos de uma revolução socialista.
C
representa a contestação ao governo monárquico.
D
apoia os projetos de reforma agrária.
740d4166-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - História - História Geral, Revoluções Liberais na Europa : Ondas de 1820, 1830 e 1848

A figura ilustra o povo francês nas ruas enfrentando as tropas governamentais em 1848:



A Revolução de 1848, conhecida pela alcunha de “Primavera dos Povos”, é caracterizada por

A
revelar-se como um exemplo da insubordinação dos nobres em meio à radicalização da burguesia.
B
expressar a ascensão da monarquia e a consolidação dos privilégios dos nobres.
C
ser o resultado de uma conjuntura econômica particularmente favorável aos interesses da população mais pobre.
D
expressar os anseios da plebe e a mobilização das camadas populares contra o Antigo Regime.
7406c357-b8
CEDERJ 2015 - História - História Geral, Renascimento Científico, Artístico e Cultural

“O século XVI é o primeiro pólo do espírito moderno. A primeira afirmação, ainda presa à herança, dum clima mental e social que revoluciona as ordens do ser, pensar e crer. O Renascimento afirma-se como uma ousadia moderna em nascimento, uma grande revolução ainda a brotar, uma idade de transição que é a bússola de origem da modernidade”. (BARRETO, Luís Felipe. Descobrimentos e Renascimento. Lisboa, Imprensa Nacional, 1983, p. 42.).

A principal característica do Renascimento é:

A
A concepção antropocêntrica e a valorização das potencialidades humanas.
B
O testemunho do protagonismo da burguesia, liberta dos entraves da era moderna.
C
A repulsa à cultura greco-romana, identificada como exemplo de uma arte sem valor.
D
A declaração de uma nova concepção artística e o desprezo ao conhecimento científico.