Questão 1335055e-b6
Prova:IF-RR 2017
Disciplina:Inglês
Assunto:Vocabulário | Vocabulary, Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

Choose the CORRECT alternative which shows the term which cannot replace nonetheless:

TEXT
       Roraima  also differs from other areas of the Amazon, given the timid way in which corporate capital has ventured into the region. Despite its natural riches, there are no large-scale mining or timber operations, and local industries are embryonic. Resulting from the mild stage of capitalist exploration, and relatively recent human occupation, the number and intensity of conflicts over regional resources are substantially smaller.
      Migration represented a leading role in the territorial, political and cultural formation of Roraima. During the 1970s and 1980s the state received a considerable influx of migrants from the North and Northeast regions of Brazil, especially from Ceará, Maranhão, Pará and Amazonas states. Overtime migration flows were perpetuated due to the workings of very active migrant social networks, linking very specific communities at origins and destinations. Internally, the city of Boa Vista has played a paramount role attracting immigrants from other states and then redistributing them to other municipalities. The importance of Boa Vista can be grasped from a quick examination of Roraima's urban network, where it exerts the role of a primate city in a highly unbalanced system.
         The tremendous influx of migrants over the 1970s and 1980s had a direct impact in the creation of new municipalities, promoting regional development and economic change, which, in turn, fueled renewed migratory flows. The 1990s and 2000s witnessed an augmentation of such moves projecting an inversion in terms of importance of inter and intrastate moves in future years. After all, interstate long distance moves have historically dominated Roraima's migration system; nonetheless, over the last decades intrastate migration has grown at a much faster pace than longer moves.
           In the near future Roraima is likely to continue drawing migrants from traditional areas given the organic nature of migrant social networks and its tendency to remain active over time. On the other hand, new migration flows are likely to arise and intensify as regional development will create economic opportunities for many, intensifying formal and informal communication channels. Within this context, the service sector, especially the public administration system will allure urban bound migrants from various Brazilian cities. However, one cannot deny the fact that Roraima remains an active agriculture frontier, where the perspective of acquiring a free plot of land is still viable. Thus, Roraima will still receive large waves of landless peasants in the near future, most likely from traditional source areas. Nevertheless, in order to become a valid alternative for the Brazilian poor, it is imperative that current abandonment rates within colonization projects are diminished, preventing them from turning into a demographic void, while the peripheral areas of the encroaching urban places become increasingly plagued with poverty.

(Fragment from “The Colonization of Roraima State, Brazil: an Analysis of its Major Migration Flows (1970 to 2010)”, by Alexandre Magno Alves Diniz and Elisângela Gonçalves Lacerda, Espace populations sociétés [Online], 2014/2-3 | 2015, Online since 01 December 2014, connection on 10 January 2017. URL : http://eps.revues.org/5817 ; DOI : 10.4000/eps.5817)

A
Whenever
B
However
C
But
D
Even so
E
Nevertheless

Gabarito comentado

J
Josiane FariaMonitor do Qconcursos

Resposta correta: A — Whenever

Tema central: conectores (linking words) de contraste vs. conectores temporais. A questão avalia se você identifica a função semântica e sintática de nonetheless no trecho e escolhe a palavra que NÃO pode substituí‑la.

Resumo teórico: Nonetheless / Nevertheless / However / Even so são conectores de contraste/concessão — ligam duas ideias opostas ou atenuam uma expectativa. Funcionam como advérbios/conjuntos discursivos e normalmente vêm entre vírgulas ou após ponto/; . Já whenever é um conector temporal/subordinador (sempre que, quando), indicando tempo ou condição repetida, e NÃO expressa contraste. (Referência: Cambridge Dictionary / Michael Swan, Practical English Usage.)

Por que a alternativa A está correta: trocar nonetheless por whenever mudaria completamente o sentido e a relação entre as orações — de oposição/concessão para tempo/condição — tornando a frase sem sentido no contexto. Logo, whenever não é substituto válido.

Análise das alternativas incorretas:

B — However: Pode substituir nonetheless em registros formais; ambos indicam contraste (= Contudo). Correta como alternativa de substituição.

C — But: Conjunção coordenativa adversativa; embora gramaticalmente diferente (conjunção vs. advérbio), em muitos contextos ela estabelece a mesma oposição informalmente. Aceitável como substituto funcional.

D — Even so: Também expressão de concessão/contraste (“mesmo assim”), equivalendo semânticamente a nonetheless. Substituição válida.

E — Nevertheless: Sinônimo direto de nonetheless, intercambiável em praticamente todos os contextos formais.

Estratégia prática para provas: ao avaliar substituições, pergunte: “essa palavra mantém a relação entre as orações (tempo vs contraste)?” Se mudar a relação (temporal → concessão ou vice‑versa), está errada. Teste rápido: leia a frase com a alternativa; se soar ilógica, elimine.

Fontes sugeridas: Cambridge Dictionary (entries for nonetheless, whenever); Michael Swan, Practical English Usage — capítulos sobre linkers/contrastives.

Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!

Estatísticas

Aulas sobre o assunto

Questões para exercitar

Artigos relacionados

Dicas de estudo