Questão b3b9585a-06
Prova:SÃO CAMILO 2019
Disciplina:Inglês
Assunto:Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
In the fifth paragraph, the text in brackets
In the fifth paragraph, the text in brackets
Leia o texto para responder à questão.
Worshiping the false idols of wellness
Before we go further, I’d like to clear something up:
wellness is not the same as medicine. Medicine is the science
of reducing death and disease, and increasing long and
healthy lives. Wellness used to mean a blend of health and
happiness. Something that made you feel good or brought
joy and was not medically harmful — perhaps a massage or
a walk along the beach. But it has become a false antidote to
the fear of modern life and death. The wellness industry takes medical terminology, such as
“inflammation” or “free radicals,” and polishes it to the point of
incomprehension. The resulting product is a “Do It Yourself”
medicine for longevity that comes with a confidence that
science can only aspire to achieve. Let’s take the trend of adding a pinch of activated charcoal
to your food or drink. While the black color is strikingly
unexpected and alluring, it’s sold as a supposed “detox.”
Guess what? It has the same efficacy as a spell from the local
witch. Maybe it’s a matter of aesthetics. Wellness potions in
beautiful jars with untested ingredients of unknown purity are
practically packaged for Instagram. Medicine and religion have long been deeply intertwined,
and it’s only relatively recently that they have separated.
The wellness-industrial complex seeks to resurrect that
connection. It’s like a medical throwback, as if the idyllic days
of health were 5,000 years ago. Ancient cleansing rituals
with a modern twist — supplements, useless products and
scientifically unsupported tests. The dietary supplements that are the backbone of
wellness make up a $30 billion a year business despite studies
showing they have no value for longevity (only a few vitamins
have proven medical benefits, like folic acid before and during
pregnancy and vitamin D for older people at risk of falling).
Modern medicine wants you to get your micronutrients from
your diet, which is inarguably the most natural source. Yet the wellness-industrial complex has managed to
pervert that narrative and make supplements a necessary tool
for nonsensical practices, such as boosting the immune system
or fighting the war on inflammation. The resulting fluorescent
yellow urine from multivitamins may provide a false sense of
efficacy, but it’s a fool’s gold (and the consequence of excessive
B2 that couldn’t possibly be absorbed). So what’s the harm of
spending money on charcoal for non-existent toxins or vitamins
for expensive urine? Here’s what: the placebo effect or “trying
something natural” can lead people with serious illnesses to
postpone effective medical care. However, I admit that doctors
can learn something from wellness. It’s clear that some people
are looking for healers, so we must find ways to serve that need
that are medically ethical.
(Jen Gunter. www.nytimes.com, 01.08.2018. Adaptado.)
Leia o texto para responder à questão.
Worshiping the false idols of wellness
Before we go further, I’d like to clear something up:
wellness is not the same as medicine. Medicine is the science
of reducing death and disease, and increasing long and
healthy lives. Wellness used to mean a blend of health and
happiness. Something that made you feel good or brought
joy and was not medically harmful — perhaps a massage or
a walk along the beach. But it has become a false antidote to
the fear of modern life and death.
The wellness industry takes medical terminology, such as
“inflammation” or “free radicals,” and polishes it to the point of
incomprehension. The resulting product is a “Do It Yourself”
medicine for longevity that comes with a confidence that
science can only aspire to achieve.
Let’s take the trend of adding a pinch of activated charcoal
to your food or drink. While the black color is strikingly
unexpected and alluring, it’s sold as a supposed “detox.”
Guess what? It has the same efficacy as a spell from the local
witch. Maybe it’s a matter of aesthetics. Wellness potions in
beautiful jars with untested ingredients of unknown purity are
practically packaged for Instagram.
Medicine and religion have long been deeply intertwined,
and it’s only relatively recently that they have separated.
The wellness-industrial complex seeks to resurrect that
connection. It’s like a medical throwback, as if the idyllic days
of health were 5,000 years ago. Ancient cleansing rituals
with a modern twist — supplements, useless products and
scientifically unsupported tests.
The dietary supplements that are the backbone of
wellness make up a $30 billion a year business despite studies
showing they have no value for longevity (only a few vitamins
have proven medical benefits, like folic acid before and during
pregnancy and vitamin D for older people at risk of falling).
Modern medicine wants you to get your micronutrients from
your diet, which is inarguably the most natural source.
Yet the wellness-industrial complex has managed to
pervert that narrative and make supplements a necessary tool
for nonsensical practices, such as boosting the immune system
or fighting the war on inflammation. The resulting fluorescent
yellow urine from multivitamins may provide a false sense of
efficacy, but it’s a fool’s gold (and the consequence of excessive
B2 that couldn’t possibly be absorbed). So what’s the harm of
spending money on charcoal for non-existent toxins or vitamins
for expensive urine? Here’s what: the placebo effect or “trying
something natural” can lead people with serious illnesses to
postpone effective medical care. However, I admit that doctors
can learn something from wellness. It’s clear that some people
are looking for healers, so we must find ways to serve that need
that are medically ethical.
(Jen Gunter. www.nytimes.com, 01.08.2018. Adaptado.)
A
shows that the author of the text is wrong.
B
motivates people to abandon supplements and adopt a
natural diet.
C
presents some exceptions to the assertion that supplements
are useless.
D
advises people to take supplements during their lives.
E
proves that supplements provide the vast majority of
nutrients people need.
Gabarito comentado
Áida Setton ZylberglejdProfessora de Inglês e Tradutora. Certificado de Proficiência pela Cambridge University. Tutora na Polytechnic of Central London.
A questão cobra interpretação de um texto sobre a diferença entre medicina e bem-estar.
Vamos analisar o enunciado:
In the fifth paragraph, the text in brackets...Tradução - No quinto parágrafo, o texto entre parênteses...
Vejamos o trecho em questão, o quinto parágrafo:
The dietary supplements that are the backbone of wellness make up a $30 billion a year business despite studies showing they have no value for longevity (only a few vitamins have proven medical benefits, like folic acid before and during pregnancy and vitamin D for older people at risk of falling). Modern medicine wants you to get your micronutrients from your diet, which is inarguably the most natural source.
Tradução - Os suplementos dietéticos que são a espinha dorsal do bem-estar perfazem um negócio de US $ 30 bilhões por ano, apesar de estudos mostrarem que eles não têm valor para a longevidade (apenas algumas vitaminas provaram benefícios médicos, como ácido fólico antes e durante a gravidez e vitamina D para pessoas mais velhas em risco de queda). A medicina moderna quer que você obtenha seus micronutrientes de sua dieta, que é indiscutivelmente a fonte mais natural.
O texto afirma que estudos mostram que os suplementos dietéticos não têm valor para a longevidade, e coloca entre parênteses algumas exceções :(apenas algumas vitaminas provaram benefícios médicos, como ácido fólico antes e durante a gravidez e vitamina D para pessoas mais velhas em risco de queda). Portanto o texto entre parênteses traz exceções à afirmação feita anteriormente, de que os suplementos dietéticos não têm valor para a longevidade.
Voltando à questão e às alternativas, no quinto parágrafo, o texto entre parênteses:
A) Incorreto - shows that the author of the text is wrong.
Tradução - mostra que o autor do texto está errado.
O trecho traz exceções ao que os estudos mostram.
B) Incorreto - motivates people to abandon supplements and adopt a natural diet.
Tradução - motiva as pessoas a abandonar os suplementos e adotar uma dieta natural.
O texto realmente infere isto, mas não no trecho entre parênteses.
C) Correto - presents some exceptions to the assertion that supplements are useless.
Tradução - apresenta algumas exceções à afirmação de que os suplementos são inúteis.
O texto entre parênteses traz exceções à afirmação feita anteriormente, de que os suplementos dietéticos não têm valor para a longevidade.
D) Incorreto - advises people to take supplements during their lives.
Tradução - aconselha as pessoas a tomarem suplementos durante a vida.
O texto tem abordagem oposta, preconiza que obtenhamos nossos micronutrientes em nossa dieta, que é indiscutivelmente a fonte mais natural. O trecho entre parênteses apenas mostra algumas vitaminas que provaram ter benefícios médicos.
E) Incorreto - proves that supplements provide the vast majority of nutrients people need.
Tradução - prova que os suplementos fornecem a grande maioria dos nutrientes de que as pessoas precisam.
O texto tem abordagem oposta, preconiza que obtenhamos nossos micronutrientes em nossa dieta, que é indiscutivelmente a fonte mais natural. O trecho entre parênteses apenas mostra algumas vitaminas que provaram ter benefícios médicos.
Gabarito do Professor: Letra C.
Vamos analisar o enunciado:
In the fifth paragraph, the text in brackets...Tradução - No quinto parágrafo, o texto entre parênteses...
Vejamos o trecho em questão, o quinto parágrafo:
The dietary supplements that are the backbone of wellness make up a $30 billion a year business despite studies showing they have no value for longevity (only a few vitamins have proven medical benefits, like folic acid before and during pregnancy and vitamin D for older people at risk of falling). Modern medicine wants you to get your micronutrients from your diet, which is inarguably the most natural source.
Tradução - Os suplementos dietéticos que são a espinha dorsal do bem-estar perfazem um negócio de US $ 30 bilhões por ano, apesar de estudos mostrarem que eles não têm valor para a longevidade (apenas algumas vitaminas provaram benefícios médicos, como ácido fólico antes e durante a gravidez e vitamina D para pessoas mais velhas em risco de queda). A medicina moderna quer que você obtenha seus micronutrientes de sua dieta, que é indiscutivelmente a fonte mais natural.
O texto afirma que estudos mostram que os suplementos dietéticos não têm valor para a longevidade, e coloca entre parênteses algumas exceções :(apenas algumas vitaminas provaram benefícios médicos, como ácido fólico antes e durante a gravidez e vitamina D para pessoas mais velhas em risco de queda). Portanto o texto entre parênteses traz exceções à afirmação feita anteriormente, de que os suplementos dietéticos não têm valor para a longevidade.
Voltando à questão e às alternativas, no quinto parágrafo, o texto entre parênteses:
A) Incorreto - shows that the author of the text is wrong.
Tradução - mostra que o autor do texto está errado.
O trecho traz exceções ao que os estudos mostram.
B) Incorreto - motivates people to abandon supplements and adopt a natural diet.
Tradução - motiva as pessoas a abandonar os suplementos e adotar uma dieta natural.
O texto realmente infere isto, mas não no trecho entre parênteses.
C) Correto - presents some exceptions to the assertion that supplements are useless.
Tradução - apresenta algumas exceções à afirmação de que os suplementos são inúteis.
O texto entre parênteses traz exceções à afirmação feita anteriormente, de que os suplementos dietéticos não têm valor para a longevidade.
D) Incorreto - advises people to take supplements during their lives.
Tradução - aconselha as pessoas a tomarem suplementos durante a vida.
O texto tem abordagem oposta, preconiza que obtenhamos nossos micronutrientes em nossa dieta, que é indiscutivelmente a fonte mais natural. O trecho entre parênteses apenas mostra algumas vitaminas que provaram ter benefícios médicos.
E) Incorreto - proves that supplements provide the vast majority of nutrients people need.
Tradução - prova que os suplementos fornecem a grande maioria dos nutrientes de que as pessoas precisam.
O texto tem abordagem oposta, preconiza que obtenhamos nossos micronutrientes em nossa dieta, que é indiscutivelmente a fonte mais natural. O trecho entre parênteses apenas mostra algumas vitaminas que provaram ter benefícios médicos.
Gabarito do Professor: Letra C.
