Questão 26fa20d8-46
Prova:UNIFESP 2010
Disciplina:Inglês
Assunto:Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

Brazil is characterized as a ‘natural knowledge economy’ because

 Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

               Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

    If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
    Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
      From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
    The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
 
(www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

A
environmental and climate changes should be globally addressed.
B
issues such as food scarcity and energy demand have been duly solved
C
there was no significant impact of biofuel crops on other agricultural commodities.
D
science and innovation opportunities have been created from its natural resources.
E
it has always produced plenty of agricultural goods thanks to its favorable climate.

Gabarito comentado

C
Cícero MedinaMonitor do Qconcursos

Resposta: Alternativa D

Tema central: interpretação textual — identificar a ideia que explica por que o autor chama o Brasil de “natural knowledge economy”. A prova exige reconhecer a paráfrase correta do trecho explicativo do texto.

Resumo teórico rápido: em questões de compreensão, procure a frase do enunciado que dá a justificativa direta (geralmente contendo palavras como “because”, “leads us to”, “reflect”). Aqui o autor diz que os recursos naturais do Brasil oferecem oportunidades para ciência e inovação — daí a expressão usada.

Justificativa da alternativa correta (D): o texto afirma que “Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’”. Ou seja, o rótulo decorre exatamente do fato de que recursos naturais criam oportunidades para ciência e inovação. (Fonte citada no próprio texto: adaptação de www.demos.co.uk; menção a Scientific American reforça reconhecimento internacional.)

Análise das alternativas incorretas:

A — embora o texto mencione mudanças climáticas e atenção global, isso não é a razão apontada para o rótulo; é consequência/contexto, não causa.

B — contradiz o texto: problemas como food scarcity e energy demand são atuais e não estão “resolvidos”.

C — o texto registra um “backlash” acusando biofuels de causar escassez de alimentos, logo há impacto reportado.

E — generalização histórica não presente no texto; o autor fala de recursos como oportunidade, não de produção sempre abundante.

Dicas estratégicas: busque a frase que expressa causa/explicação; compare alternativas com as palavras-chave do texto; elimine opções que extrapolam (afirmações absolutas) ou que mudam sentido (causa ⇄ consequência).

Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!

Estatísticas

Aulas sobre o assunto

Questões para exercitar

Artigos relacionados

Dicas de estudo