Questão 1f5079d5-46
Prova:UNIFESP 2010
Disciplina:Inglês
Assunto:Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension

The dispute about the first plane to take off and fly

 Instrução: Leia o texto para responder às questões de números 31 a 39.

               Brazil: the natural knowledge economy
Kirsten Bound – THE ATLAS OF IDEAS

    If you grew up in Europe or North America you will no doubt have been taught in school that the Wright Brothers from Ohio invented and flew the first aeroplane – the Kitty Hawk – in 1903. But if you grew up in Brazil you will have been taught that the real inventor was in fact a Brazilian from Minas Gerais called
Alberto Santos Dumont, whose 14-bis aeroplane took to the skies in 1906. This fierce historical debate, which turns on definitions of ‘practical airplanes’, the ability to launch unaided, length of time spent in the air and the credibility of witnesses, will not be resolved here. Yet it is a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.
    Almost a century later, in 2005, Santos Dumont’s intellectual heirs, the company Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica (EMBRAER), made aviation history of a different kind when they unveiled the Ipanema, the world’s first commercially produced aircraft to run solely on biofuels. This time, the world
was watching. Scientific American credited it as one of the most important inventions of the year. The attention paid to the Ipanema reflects the growing interest in biofuels as a potential solution to climate change and rising energy demand. To their advocates, biofuels – most commonly bioethanol or biodiesel – offer a more secure, sustainable energy supply that can reduce carbon emissions by 50–60 per cent compared to fossil fuels.
      From learning to fly to learning to cope with the environmental costs of flight, biofuel innovations like the Ipanema reflect some of the tensions of modern science, in which expanding the frontiers of human ingenuity goes hand in hand with managing the consequences. The recent backlash against biofuels, which has seen them blamed for global food shortages as land is reportedly diverted from food crops, points to a growing interdependence between the science and innovation systems of different countries, and between innovation, economics and environmental sustainability.
    The debates now raging over biofuels reflect some of the wider dynamics in Brazil’s innovation system. They remind us that Brazil’s current strengths and achievements have deeper historical roots than is sometimes imagined. They reflect the fact that Brazil’s natural resources and assets are a key area of opportunity for science and innovation – a focus that leads us to characterise Brazil as a ‘natural knowledge economy’. Most importantly, they highlight the propitious timing of Brazil’s growing strength in these areas at a time when climate change, the environment, food scarcity and rising worldwide energy demand are at the forefront of global consciousness. What changed between the maiden flight of the 14-bis and the maiden flight of the Ipanema is not just Brazil’s capacity for technological and scientific innovation, but the rest of the world’s appreciation of the potential of that innovation to address some of the pressing challenges that confront us all.
 
(www.demos.co.uk. Adaptado.)

A
can’t be solved due to a historical debate between Santos Dumont and the Wright Brothers
B
shows that the world does not truly accept Brazil’s innovation and invention.
C
established a plausible definition of flying artifacts as well as biased witnesses from Ohio.
D
has been solved since Santos Dumont flew his 14-bis plane in 1906.
E
has started in the USA, where children learn that the Kitty Hawk was the first plane to fly.

Gabarito comentado

J
Josiane FariaMonitor do Qconcursos

Resposta correta: B

Tema central: interpretação de texto — identificar a ideia principal e o sentido global do trecho. É preciso distinguir entre o que o texto afirma explicitamente e inferências plausíveis.

Resumo teórico rápido: Para questões de reading comprehension, pratique:

  • Identificar a ideia principal de cada parágrafo;
  • Reconhecer paráfrases nas alternativas (mesma ideia com outras palavras);
  • Evitar alternativas que acrescentam fatos não mencionados (suposições/extrapolações);
  • Conferir palavras-chave no texto para confirmar a resposta.

Fontes úteis: Cambridge University Press (Reading strategies), Purdue OWL (critical reading).

Justificativa da alternativa B (correta): O texto afirma que a disputa sobre o primeiro avião é “a striking example of the lack of global recognition for Brazil’s achievements in innovation.” A alternativa B reexpressa essa ideia: mostra que o mundo “does not truly accept Brazil’s innovation and invention” — é uma paráfrase fiel da passagem sobre reconhecimento global. Logo, B reflete a mensagem principal do trecho indicado.

Análise das alternativas incorretas:

  • A — afirma que a disputa “can’t be solved” por causa do debate. O texto diz que o conflito “will not be resolved here” (não será resolvido no texto), mas não afirma que é insolúvel em geral; além disso o foco do enunciado é o exemplo do lack of recognition, não a impossibilidade de solução histórica.
  • C — diz que o debate “established a plausible definition” e acusa “biased witnesses from Ohio”. O texto menciona que o debate “turns on definitions” e “credibility of witnesses”, mas não estabelece nenhuma definição nem acusa explicitamente testemunhas de Ohio de parcialidade — é extrapolação.
  • D — afirma que a disputa “has been solved since Santos Dumont flew in 1906”. O texto não sustenta que o assunto foi resolvido; ao contrário, mostra que a controvérsia persiste como exemplo da falta de reconhecimento.
  • E — diz que a disputa começou nos EUA porque crianças lá aprendem sobre os Wright Brothers. O texto apenas aponta diferenças de ensino entre regiões; não diz que a disputa “started” nos EUA. Aqui há confusão entre causa/origem e simples diferença de narrativa escolar.

Dica estratégica final: Procure na passagem frases que expressem diretamente a ideia central (aqui: “lack of global recognition”) e busque a alternativa que seja mera paráfrase dessa ideia. Desconfie de alternativas que adicionam detalhes não mencionados.

Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!

Estatísticas

Aulas sobre o assunto

Questões para exercitar

Artigos relacionados

Dicas de estudo