Choose the only INCORRECT alternative about
the concept of “Makers”:
TEXT 1
These days, when our slow recovery from
recession seems like a full-employment program for
pessimistic pundits, it’s great to have a new book from
Chris Anderson, an indefatigable cheerleader for the
unlimited potential of the digital economy. Anderson, the
departing editor in chief of Wired magazine, has already
written two important books exploring the impact of the
Web on commerce. In “The Long Tail,” he argued that
companies like Amazon that faced distribution
challenges arising from having large quantities of the
same kind of product would thrive by “selling less of
more.” Corporations didn’t have to chase blockbusters if
they had a mass of small sales. In “Free: The Future of a
Radical Price,” he argued that giving stuff away to attract
a multitude of users might be the best way eventually to
make money from loyal customers. Anderson has also
helped found a Web site, Geekdad, and an aerial robotics company. From his vantage point, in the future more and
more people can get involved in making things they
really enjoy and can connect with others who share their
passions and their products. These connections, he
claims, are creating a new Industrial Revolution.
In a 2010 Wired article entitled “In the Next
Industrial Revolution, Atoms Are the New Bits,”
Anderson described how the massive changes in our
relations with information have altered how we relate to
things. Now that the power of information-sharing has
been unleashed through technology and social networks,
makers are able to collaborate on design and production
in ways that facilitate the connection of producers to
markets. By sharing information “bits” in a creative
commons, entrepreneurs are making new things
(reshaping “atoms”) more cheaply and quickly. The new
manufacturing is a powerful economic force not because
any one business becomes gigantic, but because
technology makes it possible for tens of thousands of
businesses to find their customers, to form their
communities.
Anderson begins his new book, “Makers,” with
the story of his grandfather Fred Hauser, who invented a
sprinkler system. He licensed his invention to a company
that turned ideas into things that could be built and sold.
Although Hauser loved translating ideas into things, he
needed a company with resources to make enough of his
sprinklers to turn a profit. Inventing and making were
separate. With the advent of the personal computer and
of sophisticated but user-friendly design tools, that
separation has become increasingly irrelevant. As a child,
Anderson loved making things with his grandfather, and
he still loves creating new stuff and getting it into the
marketplace. “Makers” describes how today technology
has liberated the inventor from a dependence on the big
manufacturer. “The beauty of the Web is that it
democratized the tools both of invention and production,” Anderson writes. “We are all designers
now. It’s time to get good at it.”
(Fragment from “Makers: The New Industrial Revolution by
Chris Anderson”, by Michael S. Roth. Online since 24
November 2012.
URL:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/makers-thenew-industrial-revolution)
TEXT 1
These days, when our slow recovery from recession seems like a full-employment program for pessimistic pundits, it’s great to have a new book from Chris Anderson, an indefatigable cheerleader for the unlimited potential of the digital economy. Anderson, the departing editor in chief of Wired magazine, has already written two important books exploring the impact of the Web on commerce. In “The Long Tail,” he argued that companies like Amazon that faced distribution challenges arising from having large quantities of the same kind of product would thrive by “selling less of more.” Corporations didn’t have to chase blockbusters if they had a mass of small sales. In “Free: The Future of a Radical Price,” he argued that giving stuff away to attract a multitude of users might be the best way eventually to make money from loyal customers. Anderson has also helped found a Web site, Geekdad, and an aerial robotics company. From his vantage point, in the future more and more people can get involved in making things they really enjoy and can connect with others who share their passions and their products. These connections, he claims, are creating a new Industrial Revolution.
In a 2010 Wired article entitled “In the Next Industrial Revolution, Atoms Are the New Bits,” Anderson described how the massive changes in our relations with information have altered how we relate to things. Now that the power of information-sharing has been unleashed through technology and social networks, makers are able to collaborate on design and production in ways that facilitate the connection of producers to markets. By sharing information “bits” in a creative commons, entrepreneurs are making new things (reshaping “atoms”) more cheaply and quickly. The new manufacturing is a powerful economic force not because any one business becomes gigantic, but because technology makes it possible for tens of thousands of businesses to find their customers, to form their communities.
Anderson begins his new book, “Makers,” with the story of his grandfather Fred Hauser, who invented a sprinkler system. He licensed his invention to a company that turned ideas into things that could be built and sold. Although Hauser loved translating ideas into things, he needed a company with resources to make enough of his sprinklers to turn a profit. Inventing and making were separate. With the advent of the personal computer and of sophisticated but user-friendly design tools, that separation has become increasingly irrelevant. As a child, Anderson loved making things with his grandfather, and he still loves creating new stuff and getting it into the marketplace. “Makers” describes how today technology has liberated the inventor from a dependence on the big manufacturer. “The beauty of the Web is that it democratized the tools both of invention and production,” Anderson writes. “We are all designers now. It’s time to get good at it.”
(Fragment from “Makers: The New Industrial Revolution by
Chris Anderson”, by Michael S. Roth. Online since 24
November 2012.
URL:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/makers-thenew-industrial-revolution)
Gabarito comentado
Comentário de Gabarito:
Tema Central: A questão aborda o conceito de “Makers” segundo Chris Anderson, destacando como indivíduos comuns se tornam criadores e inovadores graças às ferramentas digitais, design colaborativo e o poder da internet. O tema central da questão está ligado à interpretação de texto (Reading Comprehension), ou seja, compreender e analisar ideias apresentadas em textos autênticos.
Conceito-chave: Makers são pessoas que projetam, produzem e compartilham produtos e invenções usando tecnologia digital e meios colaborativos. Segundo Anderson, isso representa uma nova Revolução Industrial onde qualquer pessoa pode inovar, criar e vender produtos por conta própria.
Justificativa para a alternativa correta (E):
E) Those who give something to a social fund or cause.
Essa afirmativa é incorreta. O texto deixa claro que “Makers” não são pessoas que doam para causas sociais, mas sim criadores independentes que usam tecnologia digital para inovar em produtos, processos e design. Anderson mantém o foco em produção, invenção e colaboração, e não em filantropia. Portanto, a alternativa foge completamente ao conceito apresentado no texto.
Análise das incorretas:
A) “Entrepreneurs making things with creativity”: Descreve perfeitamente o “Maker”, pois enfatiza a inovação individual.
B) “Businesspersons that use the internet”: O texto destaca o uso da internet para unir criadores e mercados, sendo uma característica fundamental do movimento “maker”.
C) “Designers who prefer to work in collective environment”: Coletividade e colaboração são marcantes na cultura maker, conforme Anderson expõe no texto.
D) “Inventors who establish the publishing of their production by digital means”: Publicação digital e compartilhamento de projetos são pontos centrais do “Maker Movement”.
Estratégias e Dicas:
Observe sempre palavras-chave como “invent”, “design”, “technology”, “production”. Cuidado com alternativas que mudam radicalmente o sentido central do texto, como “doar” (give/donate), que não aparece em associação com “Makers” neste contexto. Falsos cognatos (“give” x “make”) e generalizações são pegadinhas frequentes!
Resumo: A resposta correta é E, pois é a única que não tem relação com a verdadeira definição de “Maker”. Esta questão reforça a importância da leitura cuidadosa e da identificação de temas centrais em textos de língua inglesa.
Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!






