Choose the only alternative which shows what it
is INCORRECT to say about the text:
TEXT 1
These days, when our slow recovery from
recession seems like a full-employment program for
pessimistic pundits, it’s great to have a new book from
Chris Anderson, an indefatigable cheerleader for the
unlimited potential of the digital economy. Anderson, the
departing editor in chief of Wired magazine, has already
written two important books exploring the impact of the
Web on commerce. In “The Long Tail,” he argued that
companies like Amazon that faced distribution
challenges arising from having large quantities of the
same kind of product would thrive by “selling less of
more.” Corporations didn’t have to chase blockbusters if
they had a mass of small sales. In “Free: The Future of a
Radical Price,” he argued that giving stuff away to attract
a multitude of users might be the best way eventually to
make money from loyal customers. Anderson has also
helped found a Web site, Geekdad, and an aerial robotics company. From his vantage point, in the future more and
more people can get involved in making things they
really enjoy and can connect with others who share their
passions and their products. These connections, he
claims, are creating a new Industrial Revolution.
In a 2010 Wired article entitled “In the Next
Industrial Revolution, Atoms Are the New Bits,”
Anderson described how the massive changes in our
relations with information have altered how we relate to
things. Now that the power of information-sharing has
been unleashed through technology and social networks,
makers are able to collaborate on design and production
in ways that facilitate the connection of producers to
markets. By sharing information “bits” in a creative
commons, entrepreneurs are making new things
(reshaping “atoms”) more cheaply and quickly. The new
manufacturing is a powerful economic force not because
any one business becomes gigantic, but because
technology makes it possible for tens of thousands of
businesses to find their customers, to form their
communities.
Anderson begins his new book, “Makers,” with
the story of his grandfather Fred Hauser, who invented a
sprinkler system. He licensed his invention to a company
that turned ideas into things that could be built and sold.
Although Hauser loved translating ideas into things, he
needed a company with resources to make enough of his
sprinklers to turn a profit. Inventing and making were
separate. With the advent of the personal computer and
of sophisticated but user-friendly design tools, that
separation has become increasingly irrelevant. As a child,
Anderson loved making things with his grandfather, and
he still loves creating new stuff and getting it into the
marketplace. “Makers” describes how today technology
has liberated the inventor from a dependence on the big
manufacturer. “The beauty of the Web is that it
democratized the tools both of invention and production,” Anderson writes. “We are all designers
now. It’s time to get good at it.”
(Fragment from “Makers: The New Industrial Revolution by
Chris Anderson”, by Michael S. Roth. Online since 24
November 2012.
URL:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/makers-thenew-industrial-revolution)
TEXT 1
These days, when our slow recovery from recession seems like a full-employment program for pessimistic pundits, it’s great to have a new book from Chris Anderson, an indefatigable cheerleader for the unlimited potential of the digital economy. Anderson, the departing editor in chief of Wired magazine, has already written two important books exploring the impact of the Web on commerce. In “The Long Tail,” he argued that companies like Amazon that faced distribution challenges arising from having large quantities of the same kind of product would thrive by “selling less of more.” Corporations didn’t have to chase blockbusters if they had a mass of small sales. In “Free: The Future of a Radical Price,” he argued that giving stuff away to attract a multitude of users might be the best way eventually to make money from loyal customers. Anderson has also helped found a Web site, Geekdad, and an aerial robotics company. From his vantage point, in the future more and more people can get involved in making things they really enjoy and can connect with others who share their passions and their products. These connections, he claims, are creating a new Industrial Revolution.
In a 2010 Wired article entitled “In the Next Industrial Revolution, Atoms Are the New Bits,” Anderson described how the massive changes in our relations with information have altered how we relate to things. Now that the power of information-sharing has been unleashed through technology and social networks, makers are able to collaborate on design and production in ways that facilitate the connection of producers to markets. By sharing information “bits” in a creative commons, entrepreneurs are making new things (reshaping “atoms”) more cheaply and quickly. The new manufacturing is a powerful economic force not because any one business becomes gigantic, but because technology makes it possible for tens of thousands of businesses to find their customers, to form their communities.
Anderson begins his new book, “Makers,” with the story of his grandfather Fred Hauser, who invented a sprinkler system. He licensed his invention to a company that turned ideas into things that could be built and sold. Although Hauser loved translating ideas into things, he needed a company with resources to make enough of his sprinklers to turn a profit. Inventing and making were separate. With the advent of the personal computer and of sophisticated but user-friendly design tools, that separation has become increasingly irrelevant. As a child, Anderson loved making things with his grandfather, and he still loves creating new stuff and getting it into the marketplace. “Makers” describes how today technology has liberated the inventor from a dependence on the big manufacturer. “The beauty of the Web is that it democratized the tools both of invention and production,” Anderson writes. “We are all designers now. It’s time to get good at it.”
(Fragment from “Makers: The New Industrial Revolution by
Chris Anderson”, by Michael S. Roth. Online since 24
November 2012.
URL:https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/makers-thenew-industrial-revolution)
Gabarito comentado
Tema central e fundamentos:
A questão cobra interpretação de texto (reading comprehension), habilidade essencial para concursos. O desafio é identificar qual alternativa traz uma informação INCORRETA sobre o conteúdo do texto analisado, que aborda como o movimento Makers e o avanço da tecnologia digital estão revolucionando manufatura, criatividade e colaboração.
Justificativa da alternativa correta (A):
Alternativa A é a INCORRETA porque informa que “In the Next Industrial Revolution, Atoms Are the New Bits” teria sido escrito por Michael S. Roth. Na verdade, esse artigo foi escrito por Chris Anderson, principal personagem do texto. Michael S. Roth é apenas o resenhista. Esse tipo de erro exige atenção ao cruzar autoria dos textos.
Estratégia: Sempre verifique quem são os autores e protagonistas nas questões de leitura – confundir autores é um deslize clássico de prova!
Análise das alternativas incorretas:
B) Correta. O texto realmente discute os “makers” como inventores impactando uma nova revolução industrial.
C) Correta. Apresenta a visão de Michael Roth sobre perspectivas de Chris Anderson em relação ao movimento maker.
D) Correta. O texto aborda “The Makers” tanto como tendência industrial quanto como fenômeno social.
E) Correta. Embora o desenvolvimento da economia digital seja mencionado, o foco do artigo está nas mudanças trazidas pelos makers – não se faz uma defesa do “desenvolvimento irrestrito”.
Dicas para provas de inglês:
• Leia com atenção as palavras-chave que identificam autoria, opinião e tema.
• Cuidado com trocas sutis (exemplo: confundir “autor do artigo” com “autor da resenha”).
• Busque no texto relação direta entre as alternativas e a ideia principal.
• Atenção às generalizações (“ilimitado”, “sempre”, “todos”) e detalhes de contexto para evitar pegadinhas.
Conclusão:
Para acertar questões assim, treine ler propostas e opiniões, identificando quem defende qual argumento no texto. O domínio dessas técnicas é recomendado em materiais como "Inglês para Concursos" (Claiton Natal) e "Reading for Results" (Bordas e Campbell).
Gabarito: A
Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!






