Questão 0808c37e-b6
Prova:UECE 2009
Disciplina:Inglês
Assunto:Interpretação de texto | Reading comprehension
One of the factors that have led to the
surprising increase in birth rates in wealthy
nations is the fact that
One of the factors that have led to the
surprising increase in birth rates in wealthy
nations is the fact that
TEXT
One reason growth forecasts for rich
nations are so grim is the common assumption
that birth rates are falling. Fewer people will
produce less income, and shrinking economies.
Only the assumption of aging populations may be
wrong, according to a recent report by Goldman
Sachs that looks at key demographic trends for
the 21st century.
Since bottoming out in 2001, fertility
rates in a number of developed economies have
actually been on the rise. Among rich economies,
the jump is most pronounced in places like the
United Kingdom, France, Spain, and the U.S.
Larger immigrant populations in these nations
have something to do with this, as they tend to
have more children. Yet the effect is only short
term, as migrants adopt the fertility rates of their
new homes within a generation or so.
Goldman’s new analysis shows that
another reason for the unexpected jump, and one
that will play a bigger role in the future, is that women in rich countries have been having
children later and later in life, something that
traditional economic models don’t account for.
Standard estimates of fertility are still tabulated
assuming that most women are having children in
their early 20s, rather than late 20s or even 30s
and 40s, as has become more common in rich
countries with lots of women in the workforce. “In
parts of Europe (this method of calculation) has
probably understated true fertility by about 15 to
20 percent,” notes Goldman Sachs economist
Peter Berezin.
Those are big numbers, with potentially
very significant ramifications. For starters, it could
be that some of the problems faced by aging
nations with shrinking tax bases (like, for
example, overblown health-care spending,
crumbling infrastructure, and budget shortfalls)
may not be quite as bad as once envisioned. In
fact, there is some evidence to suggest that we
may soon start seeing mini baby booms, which, in
20 years or so, could have a significant impact on
the size of rich nations’ workforces, a shift that
can’t come too soon for countries now struggling
with unprecedented levels of national debt.
Another bright spot – recent surveys by
Eurobarometer show that European women
between the ages of 25 and 39 want to have more
children, if only it were easier to find a better
work-life balance. Note to European leaders: stop
worrying about the effects of immigration and
start creating better-paid part-time work.
Newsweek, September 28, 2009
TEXT
One reason growth forecasts for rich
nations are so grim is the common assumption
that birth rates are falling. Fewer people will
produce less income, and shrinking economies.
Only the assumption of aging populations may be
wrong, according to a recent report by Goldman
Sachs that looks at key demographic trends for
the 21st century.
Since bottoming out in 2001, fertility
rates in a number of developed economies have
actually been on the rise. Among rich economies,
the jump is most pronounced in places like the
United Kingdom, France, Spain, and the U.S.
Larger immigrant populations in these nations
have something to do with this, as they tend to
have more children. Yet the effect is only short
term, as migrants adopt the fertility rates of their
new homes within a generation or so.
Goldman’s new analysis shows that
another reason for the unexpected jump, and one
that will play a bigger role in the future, is that women in rich countries have been having
children later and later in life, something that
traditional economic models don’t account for.
Standard estimates of fertility are still tabulated
assuming that most women are having children in
their early 20s, rather than late 20s or even 30s
and 40s, as has become more common in rich
countries with lots of women in the workforce. “In
parts of Europe (this method of calculation) has
probably understated true fertility by about 15 to
20 percent,” notes Goldman Sachs economist
Peter Berezin.
Those are big numbers, with potentially
very significant ramifications. For starters, it could
be that some of the problems faced by aging
nations with shrinking tax bases (like, for
example, overblown health-care spending,
crumbling infrastructure, and budget shortfalls)
may not be quite as bad as once envisioned. In
fact, there is some evidence to suggest that we
may soon start seeing mini baby booms, which, in
20 years or so, could have a significant impact on
the size of rich nations’ workforces, a shift that
can’t come too soon for countries now struggling
with unprecedented levels of national debt.
Another bright spot – recent surveys by
Eurobarometer show that European women
between the ages of 25 and 39 want to have more
children, if only it were easier to find a better
work-life balance. Note to European leaders: stop
worrying about the effects of immigration and
start creating better-paid part-time work.
Newsweek, September 28, 2009
A
the immigrant population has been
reduced
B
women are choosing to become
mothers at a later age
C
young women are having more and
more children
D
hundreds of women are leaving the
workplace
Gabarito comentado
J
Josiane FariaMonitor com apoio de IA
Gabarito: B
Fundamento decisivo: O elemento decisivo é o trecho do terceiro parágrafo que afirma que um dos motivos do aumento inesperado da fertilidade é que "women in rich countries have been having children later and later in life"; esse critério de equivalência semântica entre o fator citado e a alternativa permite identificar a resposta correta.
Tema central: aumento da natalidade
Análise das alternativas
A
Errada
Está errada por contradição literal com o texto. O segundo parágrafo menciona “larger immigrant populations in these nations have something to do with this”, ou seja, populações imigrantes maiores, não reduzidas.
B
Certa
A alternativa B está correta porque reproduz com equivalência de sentido o fator causal explicitamente indicado no texto: “women in rich countries have been having children later and later in life”. Portanto, o aumento inesperado das taxas de natalidade é associado, entre outros fatores, ao adiamento da maternidade para idades mais avançadas.
C
Errada
Está errada porque inverte o dado etário central do texto. O trecho decisivo afirma que o fator relevante é ter filhos mais tarde, “rather than” no início dos 20 anos. A alternativa fala em jovens tendo cada vez mais filhos, que é o oposto do que foi destacado.
D
Errada
Está errada por introduzir informação inexistente. O texto menciona países ricos “with lots of women in the workforce” e fala em dificuldade de equilíbrio entre trabalho e vida pessoal, mas não afirma que centenas de mulheres estão deixando o mercado de trabalho.
Pegadinha da questão
A banca explora a troca entre o fator real do texto — maternidade mais tardia — e formulações distorcidas por negação, inversão etária ou acréscimo indevido de informação, além de exigir atenção ao fato de que a pergunta pede apenas um dos fatores.
Dica para questões semelhantes
- Localize no texto o trecho que responde literalmente ao núcleo da pergunta antes de comparar as alternativas.
- Em questões de reading, elimine opções que trocam aumento por redução, juventude por idade mais avançada ou acrescentam informação não afirmada.
- Quando a alternativa correta vier como paráfrase, confirme se ela preserva o mesmo agente, o mesmo fator causal e o mesmo sentido temporal do trecho original.






