It is true to affirm that, in America:
1) costs of funerals have gone up a lot over the last
40 years.2) traditional funeral costs cannot be any higher than
$10,000.
3) more people were cremated in the past than they
are now.
4) 1.5 million dead people make it possible for many
to make a living.
5) more than a hundred thousand people work in the
funeral industry.
The correct alternatives are only:
Read the text below and answer the following
question based on it.
Death of The Death Care Industry
Death is a dying industry with an economic phenomenon.
As Americans perceived value of “traditional” funerals
diminish, the cost of funerals have increased nearly 1,328%
in just four decades. In 1960 the average cost of a funeral
was $706 when only 3.56% of bodies were cremated.
Today the average traditional funeral costs between $8,000
and $10,000, and about 42% of people are cremated. The
US funeral industry accounts for about $20 billion in annual
economic activity, with around 130,000 employees that
make a living on the 1.5 million people that go to rest each
year.
Many communities have turned a blind eye to what goes on
inside funeral homes, as many people prefer not to know
the ins and out of the business. In addition, grieving
customers in need of funeral goods and services may not be
in a healthy state of mind to make financial decisions. Grief
has similar side effects of alcohol consumption, such as
numbness, guilt, and depression, resulting in less alert and
price sensitive customers. In addition, the funeral industry is
somewhat taboo in the sense that communities in general
don’t communicate with one another about what are
acceptable practices in this industry.
Some funeral service providers have taken advantage of
this by encouraging the lack of transparency in the industry,
charging exorbitant prices for funeral goods and services
and charging people who appear to be wealthy higher
prices. After Jessica Mitford published The American Way
of Death in 1963, to expose the abuses in the funeral
industry, a groundswell of support for government intervention followed. Under President Ronald Reagan The
Funeral Rule was first enacted to protect consumers from
deceptive practices, but the rule has yet to put the nail in the
coffin.
Adaptado de: <https://www.forbes.com/sites/perianneboring/2014/04/25/the-death-of-the-death-care-industry-and-eternal-life-online/#389398011c1a>Acessado em 13 de outubro de 2017
Read the text below and answer the following question based on it.
Death of The Death Care Industry
Death is a dying industry with an economic phenomenon. As Americans perceived value of “traditional” funerals diminish, the cost of funerals have increased nearly 1,328% in just four decades. In 1960 the average cost of a funeral was $706 when only 3.56% of bodies were cremated. Today the average traditional funeral costs between $8,000 and $10,000, and about 42% of people are cremated. The US funeral industry accounts for about $20 billion in annual economic activity, with around 130,000 employees that make a living on the 1.5 million people that go to rest each year.
Many communities have turned a blind eye to what goes on inside funeral homes, as many people prefer not to know the ins and out of the business. In addition, grieving customers in need of funeral goods and services may not be in a healthy state of mind to make financial decisions. Grief has similar side effects of alcohol consumption, such as numbness, guilt, and depression, resulting in less alert and price sensitive customers. In addition, the funeral industry is somewhat taboo in the sense that communities in general don’t communicate with one another about what are acceptable practices in this industry.
Some funeral service providers have taken advantage of this by encouraging the lack of transparency in the industry, charging exorbitant prices for funeral goods and services and charging people who appear to be wealthy higher prices. After Jessica Mitford published The American Way of Death in 1963, to expose the abuses in the funeral industry, a groundswell of support for government intervention followed. Under President Ronald Reagan The Funeral Rule was first enacted to protect consumers from deceptive practices, but the rule has yet to put the nail in the coffin.
Adaptado de: <https://www.forbes.com/sites/perianneboring/2014/04/25/the-death-of-the-death-care-industry-and-eternal-life-online/#389398011c1a>Acessado em 13 de outubro de 2017
Gabarito comentado
Resposta correta: A (1, 4 e 5).
Tema central: interpretação de texto factual — identificar informações explícitas no texto (números, causas e efeitos) e distinguir enunciados verdadeiros de afirmações excessivas ou invertidas.
Resumo conceitual prático: ao responder, foque em: dados numéricos (ex.: 1.328%, $706 → $8–10k, 3,56% → 42%), termos absolutos (“cannot”, “any higher”), e correspondência literal entre o que o texto diz e a alternativa.
Justificativa da alternativa A (correta):
1) Verdadeira — o texto afirma aumento de quase 1.328% em quatro décadas; dados comparativos (1960: $706 → hoje: $8–10k) confirmam que os custos subiram muito.
4) Verdadeira — o texto afirma que “around 130,000 employees … make a living on the 1.5 million people that go to rest each year”: a frase corresponde à ideia da alternativa (1,5 milhão de mortos possibilitam o sustento de muitos).
5) Verdadeira — o texto menciona “around 130,000 employees”, logo “mais de cem mil” é correto.
Análise das alternativas incorretas:
2) Falsa — o texto diz que o custo médio está “between $8,000 and $10,000”; isso não suporta a afirmação absoluta “cannot be any higher” (não podemos concluir que seja impossível haver funerais mais caros que $10.000).
3) Falsa — inversão temporal: em 1960 apenas 3,56% eram cremados; hoje cerca de 42% o são. Logo, mais pessoas são cremadas agora, não no passado.
Dicas de estratégia para provas:
- Procure números e datas para checar alternativas quantitativas.
- Desconfie de palavras absolutas (cannot, always, never) quando o texto usa termos aproximados (about, around, between).
- Releia trechos-chave para confirmar que a alternativa reproduz corretamente a ideia original — cuidado com inversionismos (mais X no passado vs. no presente).
Fontes citadas no texto de apoio: artigo adaptado (Forbes) e referência à “Funeral Rule” da Federal Trade Commission (proteção ao consumidor instaurada na década de 1980).
Gostou do comentário? Deixe sua avaliação aqui embaixo!






